Suarez rumours!! Seriously?!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Much rather we went for Rooney, I physically couldn't stomach that rat faced poisonous **** putting on our shirt.
 
If you really don't want Lukaku we'd take him off your hands for a few quid........ :bandit:
 
London's Only EC Winners:5006069 said:
Wouldn't you rather keep your best player?

Obviously, hence me saying it would have to be a high figure! That sort of money could make a difference IF we spent it wisely.

Plus, Suarez is a ****!
 
Reports today that Lafferpool are prepared to drop their asking price. Seems they are ready to get rid and come Aug 31st the price will be lower and then the owners will be claiming they didn't have time to reinvest and mid table is once again guaranteed.
 
CPofL KTBFFH:5006815 said:
Reports today that Lafferpool are prepared to drop their asking price. Seems they are ready to get rid and come Aug 31st the price will be lower and then the owners will be claiming they didn't have time to reinvest and mid table is once again guaranteed.

I'm sure the club would make something like that public news <doh>
 
Reports today that Lafferpool are prepared to drop their asking price. Seems they are ready to get rid and come Aug 31st the price will be lower and then the owners will be claiming they didn't have time to reinvest and mid table is once again guaranteed.

I wouldn't be surprised if they do drop the asking price. They will not want this dragging on late into August given they play United on Sept 1st. That's a season defining game for them.
 
I'm sure the club would make something like that public news <doh>

I don't know but it's in the press. You have to get news from somewhere and the reporter is known for his Lafferpool bias and previously correct stories. It's also why I said 'reports' <doh>