1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Suarez given 10 game ban

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by tomw24, Apr 24, 2013.

  1. #42

    #42 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,180
    Likes Received:
    11
    I'd much rather someone bite me on the arm on purpose than fly in knee height recklessly with excessive force. McManaman's challenge was much worse than this. He didn't get a ban at all despite the referee giving nothing at the time. The thing with McManaman is he'd done the same in the past, he's a **** player.
     
    #41
  2. randomsamno9

    randomsamno9 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    3
    Absolutely right, same issue with Portsmouth, seem to get off lightly where other teams were punished much more severely, despite overspending on a much larger scale (though I think it was more the football league than the FA, but still all the football organizations in this country are quite inconsistent). If they have these rules they should stick to them, it was clearly harm with intent, not a misplaced tackle, and should be treated as such in every circumstance. Although I do agree that considering Suarez past antics this does make it a little more exceptional.
     
    #42
  3. TheSecondStain

    TheSecondStain Needs an early night

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    39,383
    Likes Received:
    8,819
    Unless a player is gasping for air, and the opponent's arm sweeps around and ends up in the player's mouth. A very rare occurrence I would imagine.
     
    #43
  4. pass the football

    pass the football Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    10,012
    Likes Received:
    53
    Shirt-pulling can't be an accident either, maybe we should give 10-match bans for that too ;)
     
    #44
  5. TheSecondStain

    TheSecondStain Needs an early night

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    39,383
    Likes Received:
    8,819
    I do think a 10 game ban was the absolute minimum, especially as he'd done it before. Can anyone of you imagine still being in employment if you'd bitten someone, unprovoked..? As Liverpool wanted to keep him, they had to suffer not having him for a long while. Personally, I would have made the ban longer.
     
    #45
  6. AberdeenSaint

    AberdeenSaint Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    3,978
    Likes Received:
    3,616
    I agree - things seem to be out of proportion. The worst Suarez could have done was give him rabies. The biting is cringingly embarrassing more than anything - a habit kids grow out by the time they are five.
     
    #46
  7. Joe!

    Joe! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,397
    Likes Received:
    71
    This has been happening to me as well today. Can anyone explain?
     
    #47
  8. Qwerty

    Qwerty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    14,006
    Likes Received:
    3,515
    Yes.




    The site is farked.
     
    #48
  9. Piebacca

    Piebacca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    7,739
    Likes Received:
    739
    Football referees and the lawmakers of the game could learn a hell of a lot from Rugby.
     
    #49
  10. Lord Duckhunter

    Lord Duckhunter New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    7
    Absolutely spot on.

    The FA took action on Ben Thatcher after the ref had taken action, so they can if they deem an offence exceptional. They didn't with Defoe, so therefore Suarez's offense should have been dealt with in the same way (not exceptional). Violent conduct unseen by the referee carries a 3 game ban, not a 10 game ban. They can not deem the same offense as exceptional in some cases and not others. Biting is either exceptional or it's not. It shouldn't depend on whether you are an English international. What about his previous biting , remember the FA don't consider biting exceptional (see Defoe case) therefore are the FA going to start taking other non exceptional cases for 2 years prior into account in future disciplinary events?
    Had the ref yellow carded Suarez, you can bet your life the FA would have increased the punishment rather than do what they did with Defoe.

    Whilst on the subject of consistency John Terry got 4 games for racial abuse, Suarez 8.

    Is there one rule for Englishmen and one for Johnny Foreigner?

    The whole thing stinks.
     
    #50

  11. wheres_me_guly

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2011
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    5
    I haven't read through the thread but does this put us above them in the fair play table?
     
    #51
  12. Romsey_Saint

    Romsey_Saint Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4,158
    Likes Received:
    2,262
    I hope he appeals and, on reflection, the FA realises their gross error of judgement; apologises publically for getting the original sentance wrong and gives him an even longer ban!
     
    #52
  13. SAINTDON13

    SAINTDON13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    16,183
    Likes Received:
    2,499
    I would love Rickie to wear a shirt with velcro strips, so that every time he gets a shirt tug, parts of it peel off. Sadly he would spending most of the match sealing it up again.
     
    #53
  14. pass the football

    pass the football Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    10,012
    Likes Received:
    53
    I certainly hope not, but it's difficult to conclude otherwise. The FA bend their own rules to look after England players it seems.
     
    #54
  15. AberdeenSaint

    AberdeenSaint Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    3,978
    Likes Received:
    3,616
    In 1976 I got called a little Jock bastard playing for Soton Colleges v Woolston Wednesday. I`d never been so offended - I`m 5`9".
     
    #55
  16. Lff

    Lff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    3,740
    Likes Received:
    882
    I know you are being ironic but actually they should start cracking down on it in some way. Also, all the diving and cheating that goes on. Maybe some sort of hefty ban would put a stop to it.
     
    #56
  17. fran-MLs little camera

    fran-MLs little camera Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    69,231
    Likes Received:
    24,803
    Never seen a footballer try and gouge an opponents eye out, though. I would suggest that deliberate injuring of opponents is more common in rugby than in football.
     
    #57
  18. pass the football

    pass the football Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    10,012
    Likes Received:
    53
    If the opportunity was there and they thought they could get away with it, it would happen.

    Goodness knows what Suarez would bite if he was at the bottom of a ruck!
     
    #58
  19. thereisonlyoneno7

    thereisonlyoneno7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    20,888
    Likes Received:
    31,946
    Rugby is a game played by men with odd shaped balls

    PS He deserves it.
     
    #59
  20. TheSecondStain

    TheSecondStain Needs an early night

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    39,383
    Likes Received:
    8,819
    Rugby is a high contact sport, and there is plenty of opportunity of accidental and deliberate flouting of the rules. For example, biting in Rugby used to be commonplace, but you never saw it happen. In comparison, Association Football is largely non-contact and the comparable opportunities are much less. I played both, by the way, though I was far better at football.
     
    #60

Share This Page