Match Day Thread Stoke City vs QPR

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Trammers said:
Here it is Col...... If you get onto LFW homepage and the click on "Home" top left for options you can get all the previews and reports, no need to be registered on their site to access them.......

https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/queensparkrangers/news/57649/insipid-qpr-out-with-barely-a-whimper-–-report
Click to expand...

This guy clearly isn't a member of the Warburton rose tinted glasses club like Clive.
Would love to read Clive's take on it.

Warburton is a busted flush and has to go imo.
I actually can't quite believe the amount of support he's still getting.
Opinions eh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: deano58
QPR Oslo said:
No. I just disagreed with your Sanderson comment. Think they are all trying.. I'd never seen Sanderson play RB before and as he turned out yesterday was ok defensive but never got forward. I think Warburton would have done better starting us as we finished more or less..Sanderson Dunne and Barbet a back 3, and Kakay / Albert at RWB as they both can get forward and get crosses in. Albert obviously better going forward but perhaps not fit enough to play 90 minutes. Only other difference for me was I wouldnt have played Thomas who for all his running never scores. I'd have played Gray up front with Dykes or Austin, subbing one for the other as he did. Midfield Field, Dozzell and Chair or Amos furthest forward of those 3. Hendrick hadn't trained properly since his hamstring injury, so was never going to start and unlikely to be used.
Click to expand...
Sorry that was a reply to Hammersmith. No idea what Prr means. I've fat fingered it somehow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QPR Oslo
cor blymie said:
that first half performance, for a game of that importance, was absolutely shocking. Mark's tenure is surely up.Like others I'm surprised at the support
he gets. Seems the only defence they offer is who can we get<confused>
Click to expand...

I dont think it's a question of who can we get, the track record of Les & Lee Hoos on choosing the manager Is pretty poor (Warburton being the exception) we dont want to be going back to the bad old days of the revolving door
 
  • Like
Reactions: QPR Oslo
There’s a fair amount of players in our team who wouldn’t get in any other team in the championship
 
rangercol said:
Absolutely.
I also don't think any of us are saying that any replacement for Warburton would be a definite success.
I just think, like you that he's taken us as far as he can and possibly back towards mid table by the end of the season.
It's obviously not all his fault but, in my opinion, too much of it is.
Click to expand...
Agreed,can't see how he can push on next season, and more importantly it seems the players aren't buying into his philosophy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
Sutfol said:
There’s a fair amount of players in our team who wouldn’t get in any other team in the championship
Click to expand...
Agree but there's a good few who would under the right leadership and tactics. Willock would get into any of the teams in this league maybe barring Fulham although he's way better than Cairney. Dieng, Dunne, Field and probably Chair would get into most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobmid
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back