Agree with all of the above and a refreshing change for Tucker to put out something constructive.
However, in terms of Tan leaving I have to ask the questions I have been posing for the last 2 years (mostly to Dull Dai): -
1. Will he just walk away and leave his money in the club? No is the answer.
2. Is there anyone else out there with fantastic wealth who will pay Tan off and fund us going forward? Again no.
3. If Tan packs his bags and says "By the way, pay me what you owe me", how on earth do we afford that, even if structured over a few years? We can't. We couldn't even pay our way if he just said he was putting no more money into the club and would put a line under what is owed.
4. Where does that leave us? Well and truly in the sh!t and supporting a club on a rapid downward spiral to the extent that in a year or two once the death throes have ceased we could be playing on the park next to the stadium to a crowd of a man and his dog. It would make Portsmouth's or even Ranger's decline look like a summer picnic.
For all he has done, my biggest criticism of Tan is that he does not appear to have capitalised much of his debt as he said he would do once the Langston issue was resolved. Does that not constitute a loss of face which is so important in his culture?
A positive change on the field will help in the short term but I can't see that happening if/until Slade gets some new faces on board in January. If we see an improvement on the pitch it will assist the mood off it but that will have to be sustained throughout the rest of the season.
Tan is obviously so thick skinned that he also can't understand that a simple act of returning to blue would help lift the support, maybe put more bums back on seats and remove some of the division within the fan base.
Putting all that to one side, Ninian's comment, "Going to the match used to be something to look forward to; now it's a chore" sums it up for me. We desperately need excitement back on the field to give us a reason to go to games.