Its worse than grooming young girls and blowing innocent people up too apparentlyStealing from shops is wrong?
Its worse than grooming young girls and blowing innocent people up too apparentlyStealing from shops is wrong?
Had the pleasure to meet leeds60 after the match yesterday.After two years, and WJ, rightly so, asking for his return![]()
When you see Glory next, ask him why Leeds 60 was bannedHad the pleasure to meet leeds60 after the match yesterday.
Spent a very enjoyable couple of hours chatting about life, loves and all things Leeds United.
Asked him just before we left why he was banned and he said he didn't know.
It's quite a while ago now but I do remember wondering at the time why had he been banned as I hadn't read anything that seemed worthy of a ban.
Now it's my regret I didn't ask more questions at that time. Guess I was rather blinkered where our moderators were concerned and just assumed they must be right.
When you see Glory next, ask him why Leeds 60 was banned![]()

My understanding of it is leeds60 was banned because of a series of complaints by pm's to mods.When you see Glory next, ask him why Leeds 60 was banned![]()
Always thought he was your firstWhen you see Glory next, ask him why Leeds 60 was banned![]()
Is that what the coppers told you?Stealing from shops is wrong?
My understanding of it is leeds60 was banned because of a series of complaints by pm's to mods.
So he wasn't directly banned because of anything he posted on the forum.
That to me seems totally unfair as it doesn't take into account the many posters who would have been in favour of ignoring those complaints.
I certainly would have been one of those as he's a top guy.

It's all very strange TC.That's it in a nutshell Jammy.
We sign up to this forum to debate football and partake in the banter - simple as that.
If people are offended at Leeds60's (I'm always right posts) or Gory's (fishing trips), they really shouldn't bother signing up!
If the mods think that dishing out bans because of either private PM's from these moaners or because of their own personal vendetta's is accetable to the rest of us, they really shouldn't be involved in this site![]()
Jammy 07 I have zero beef with you but it doesn't matter what I say, you have built up an opinion and picture of me so you won't believe me either way but 2-3 members threatened to leave over Leeds60 openly posting in this thread https://www.not606.com/threads/glory-ristac-leeds60s-sexual-chemisty-thread.311272/ You can ask Bucks and Elland but as far as I am aware their inbox was full of PM's from GloryMy understanding of it is leeds60 was banned because of a series of complaints by pm's to mods.
Your pretty sure could not be further from the truth. I even had PM's from Glory at the time just before Leeds60 ban and let's just say it wasn't banter or fishing, Glory wasn't a mod true, but he was one of the main people behind Leeds60 getting a ban.Wasn't Glory that banned him though - and I,m pretty sure that Glory said at the time he felt it was wrong![]()
That was one of many replies aimed at Leeds60Hopefully the mods will see this and take some appropriate steps....
It's well overdue for the cause to be dealt with and to stop tinkering around the symptoms.
Myself and Glory were on the end of some strange happenings I won't deny that, I did send a PM at the time to the mods saying I would prefer him NOT to be banned but I am not going to lie, we didn't see eye to eye until you had that little chat in my earAlways thought he was your first![]()
You being a moderator I would suggest with respect that you keep some of your comments to yourself instead of trying to stir the sh--. You are obviously over the moon that Glory has been banned if you had any sense you would let it rest. Opening old wounds is never good.When you see Glory next, ask him why Leeds 60 was banned![]()
Didn't realise that being a moderator meant not speaking your mind so with respect you're talking ****. Over the moon? No but I voted to ban him so happy he isn't here but would prefer him to be here and not causing troubleYou being a moderator I would suggest with respect that you keep some of your comments to yourself instead of trying to stir the sh--. You are obviously over the moon that Glory has been banned if you had any sense you would let it rest. Opening old wounds is never good.
Jammy 07 I have zero beef with you but it doesn't matter what I say, you have built up an opinion and picture of me so you won't believe me either way but 2-3 members threatened to leave over Leeds60 openly posting in this thread https://www.not606.com/threads/glory-ristac-leeds60s-sexual-chemisty-thread.311272/ You can ask Bucks and Elland but as far as I am aware their inbox was full of PM's from Glory
Your pretty sure could not be further from the truth. I even had PM's from Glory at the time just before Leeds60 ban and let's just say it wasn't banter or fishing, Glory wasn't a mod true, but he was one of the main people behind Leeds60 getting a ban.
That was one of many replies aimed at Leeds60
Myself and Glory were on the end of some strange happenings I won't deny that, I did send a PM at the time to the mods saying I would prefer him NOT to be banned but I am not going to lie, we didn't see eye to eye until you had that little chat in my ear![]()
what you saying.Already been banned from talking to Lady mods because they are like putty in my hands.(joking)AllegedlyOf course he was banned because of what he posted on here mate, that's why people complained, because of his style of posting, and his continuing 'war' with Glory, who kept it going in the name of banter/fishing, but some didn't give him the benefit of his age, but he knows a thing or two about football, yes he kept repeating himself and getting names wrong, but he was/is harmless, he just annoyed the **** out of people, not me I hasten to add, I just read a line of his posts and thought i'll leave that, he's said it a dozen times already, in fact I found it a bit funny that he wound people up without trying.My understanding of it is leeds60 was banned because of a series of complaints by pm's to mods.
So he wasn't directly banned because of anything he posted on the forum.
That to me seems totally unfair as it doesn't take into account the many posters who would have been in favour of ignoring those complaints.
I certainly would have been one of those as he's a top guy.

But it appears to me that you are causing trouble by your constant digs at Glory.Didn't realise that being a moderator meant not speaking your mind so with respect you're talking ****. Over the moon? No but I voted to ban him so happy he isn't here but would prefer him to be here and not causing trouble
Of course he was banned because of what he posted on here mate, that's why people complained, because of his style of posting, and his continuing 'war' with Glory, who kept it going in the name of banter/fishing, but some didn't give him the benefit of his age, but he knows a thing or two about football, yes he kept repeating himself and getting names wrong, but he was/is harmless, he just annoyed the **** out of people, not me I hasten to add, I just read a line of his posts and thought i'll leave that, he's said it a dozen times already, in fact I found it a bit funny that he wound people up without trying.
I don't think he should have been banned either btw![]()

To be fair 2p, its not Ristac that keeps bringing this up all the timeBut it appears to me that you are causing trouble by your constant digs at Glory.
Anyway we now have it on record that you prefer him to be back on here.
On a more important point has anyone any update on the health of Glory.

Totally agree mate,Spot on mate - I'd like to know who are all these posters continually complaining via PM - seems that the Leeds not606 crew are just a bunch of sissy's![]()
I've said it thousands of times, if you don't like someone and they're talking bollox, tell the **** to **** off 
There was no dig, I was pointing out a fact. I would have preferred Glory to have still been here and behaving, I said in another post several days ago that it is a pity we only had Glory posting on here and not Steve the guy many have met and who have said is completely different in real life.But it appears to me that you are causing trouble by your constant digs at Glory.
Anyway we now have it on record that you prefer him to be back on here.
On a more important point has anyone any update on the health of Glory.