** STATEMENT REGARDING GLORY **

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Throwing your toys out and telling me to grow up?

Two year bans better than four, your logic is flawed,

I'm not wasting anymore time on this, 19 pages of glorys mates flirting with minxy helped no one<ok>
You were the one who wanted us to take it their instead of other threads,then you see something you don't like,so lock it and start with the I'm the mighty dictator bit,tell you what put up a poll,lets see who thought the 4 years was a joke and who didn't,there's me,minxy and ristac who didn't think it was a joke to start with.And as for Minxy and brb posting last night,I never told them to post,and we all had our say.Take it you don't like people having there say unless it's agreeing with you.
 
You were the one who wanted us to take it their instead of other threads,then you see something you don't like,so lock it and start with the I'm the mighty dictator bit,tell you what put up a poll,lets see who thought the 4 years was a joke and who didn't,there's me,minxy and ristac who didn't think it was a joke to start with.And as for Minxy and brb posting last night,I never told them to post,and we all had our say.Take it you don't like people having there say unless it's agreeing with you.

A quick flick back through the countless emails from one poster calling for Mike to be banned and it looked about four years ago, it must have took a while before someone got his way. I plucked that figure out of the air and put a smiley on it. Things do get lost in translation as you well know.

I've accepted you made a point and reopened the thread, so your last statement doesn't really make sense.
 
Can’t believe I spent 10 minutes writing a reply on the grow up thread hit post and it had gone ;)

I’m going to paste it in here...

It’s obvious some feel very strongly about the disruption Glory has caused. It’s obvious some feel equally as strongly about the ban. It’s easier for me to say as I’ve not been a mod that long but Bucks has managed this forum since, well way back, I’m guessing he thought with the backing of two other mods he made a decision that he believed was for the interest of the forum (using his vote to ban) rightly or wrongly, the important bit is he did it feeling it was best for the majority, not himself.

Not aimed directly at you Cheesh and if ever I was sacked at work I’d love you fighting my corner, but should people respect the decision just a little bit more, I’m not asking for anyone to agree, but sure say I’m not happy and move on? Bucks is a forum manager as such, it would take some mighty balls for some people to speak to their works manager like this, again not aimed at any one individual.

Mods are not paid, members do not pay memberships, I think we all forget this at times, it’s great in here, it’s free and personally I feel the forum has improved with Glory gone, I’m happy to accept others will differ in opinion.

Roll the clock back a few weeks, Bucks was getting lots of grief due to Glorys shall we say antics, throw in the disrespect that was shown with those purposely going out of their way to make the match day thread anything but on topic and I’m sure he felt like it was an attempt to undermine him.

Questions after question, each piece of information being put out there being dissected, today he snapped, not because you questioned the 4 year ban of Leeds60, it was just the final straw. I think we all need a deep breathe, remember this is meant to be fun and I agree, let the Supermods see if they agree with Bucks as he’s most senior or have their own verdict <ok>
 
Fair enough .... I haven't been on Not606 for ages for personal reasons .... so am catching up at the mo

.... the whole Glory ban thing was done before my return

... so although Glory probably thinks I was plotting against him I can honestly say I haven't thought about him for months
All the Welsh and QPR rejects hang out on the Barnsley board. You got a perfectly good and active board here, but you spend hours on there looking at, well basically nothing...other than word games. Oh and your other interest was the Villa board <whistle>

New evidence has come to light this morning which shows that Glory did not have any 2nd accounts.

Therefore the statement that he did and the fact he is being acredited with posting " revenge is a dish best served cold " is again totally incorrect.

This just seems to indicate further bias against Glory and calls into question whether this whole process is prejudiced.

Perhaps Eric Le Merde can assist but I think that is very much his decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wakeybreakyheart
Can’t believe I spent 10 minutes writing a reply on the grow up thread hit post and it had gone ;)

I’m going to paste it in here...

It’s obvious some feel very strongly about the disruption Glory has caused. It’s obvious some feel equally as strongly about the ban. It’s easier for me to say as I’ve not been a mod that long but Bucks has managed this forum since, well way back, I’m guessing he thought with the backing of two other mods he made a decision that he believed was for the interest of the forum (using his vote to ban) rightly or wrongly, the important bit is he did it feeling it was best for the majority, not himself.

Not aimed directly at you Cheesh and if ever I was sacked at work I’d love you fighting my corner, but should people respect the decision just a little bit more, I’m not asking for anyone to agree, but sure say I’m not happy and move on? Bucks is a forum manager as such, it would take some mighty balls for some people to speak to their works manager like this, again not aimed at any one individual.

Mods are not paid, members do not pay memberships, I think we all forget this at times, it’s great in here, it’s free and personally I feel the forum has improved with Glory gone, I’m happy to accept others will differ in opinion.

Roll the clock back a few weeks, Bucks was getting lots of grief due to Glorys shall we say antics, throw in the disrespect that was shown with those purposely going out of their way to make the match day thread anything but on topic and I’m sure he felt like it was an attempt to undermine him.

Questions after question, each piece of information being put out there being dissected, today he snapped, not because you questioned the 4 year ban of Leeds60, it was just the final straw. I think we all need a deep breathe, remember this is meant to be fun and I agree, let the Supermods see if they agree with Bucks as he’s most senior or have their own verdict <ok>
You mods had your say to brb asking for the ban,one sided to say the least,Glory or no other person was allowed to speak on his behalf,yes I took the opportunity to give Minxy and brb my side of things which bucks was obviously unhappy with,I find an irony that Glory was banned in part for bullying,when a mod does the same to me.
 
You mods had your say to brb asking for the ban,one sided to say the least,Glory or no other person was allowed to speak on his behalf,yes I took the opportunity to give Minxy and brb my side of things which bucks was obviously unhappy with,I find an irony that Glory was banned in part for bullying,when a mod does the same to me.

Are you suggesting I'm bullying you?
 
New evidence has come to light this morning which shows that Glory did not have any 2nd accounts.

Therefore the statement that he did and the fact he is being acredited with posting " revenge is a dish best served cold " is again totally incorrect.

This just seems to indicate further bias against Glory and calls into question whether this whole process is prejudiced.

Perhaps Eric Le Merde can assist but I think that is very much his decision.

Well that's a load of bollocka and irelevant anyway . You keep getting your little think tank in operation, your not helping anyone.glory is banned for all the reasons listed above and Glory has accepted his ban like a man (make of it what you will) and for you to continually spout all this crap and going round in circles is counter productive and the more the super mods read about the bigger impact glory is still having on this board in a negative fashion it will mo doibt influence the ban length.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OLOF
Are you suggesting I'm bullying you?
Yes,your arrempting to do just that with your brb ban him for 2 years and its all your fault,[Play with words but that's what you said]I did hope for a fair hearing,but you were never going to let glory have one were you.Get on with it,I m sure you will get your way.
 
New evidence has come to light this morning which shows that Glory did not have any 2nd accounts.

Therefore the statement that he did and the fact he is being acredited with posting " revenge is a dish best served cold " is again totally incorrect.

This just seems to indicate further bias against Glory and calls into question whether this whole process is prejudiced.

Perhaps Eric Le Merde can assist but I think that is very much his decision.

For what it's worth I was messaged from the Villa board and entered into a conversation with somebody I didn't know and there was indeed discussion in line with the above. I was instantly banned from the Villa board and since then appear to have been subjected to some sort of vetting of my posts, they take 5 minutes to post, i.e. I am given a time that I have to wait before I can post and getting onto the forum is an exercise in itself. So interactive discussion is quite difficult based on the speed of your discussions. I therefore apologise for the timing of my future posts.

I don't know who it was on the Villa board, I have only ever discussed matches with Larry AV on the villa board before, he seems to be the only person that regularly uses their forum.
 
Last edited:
Yes,your arrempting to do just that with your brb ban him for 2 years and its all your fault,[Play with words but that's what you said]I did hope for a fair hearing,but you were never going to let glory have one were you.Get on with it,I m sure you will get your way.

Maybe I'm at my wits end with all this but I'm certainly not a bully.

yoube argued every decision so far and now it's out of my hands to disprove any bias (short memory's you lot seem to have as it was me that kept glory from being banned for God knows how long by taking the supermod's on) and I'm still getting ****. I'm just as frustrated as you at the end of the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OLOF and Whitejock
New evidence has come to light this morning which shows that Glory did not have any 2nd accounts.

Therefore the statement that he did and the fact he is being acredited with posting " revenge is a dish best served cold " is again totally incorrect.

This just seems to indicate further bias against Glory and calls into question whether this whole process is prejudiced.

Perhaps Eric Le Merde can assist but I think that is very much his decision.
The kangaroo court has spoken m8,and if we continue to question the dictators decision he will have us all banned I'm sure.
 
Maybe I'm at my wits end with all this but I'm certainly not a bully.

yoube argued every decision so far and now it's out of my hands to disprove any bias (short memory's you lot seem to have as it was me that kept glory from being banned for God knows how long by taking the supermod's on) and I'm still getting ****. I'm just as frustrated as you at the end of the day.
No your not,you had your say with the supermods and when I/we tried to put our side we are jumped on,he's never going to get any fair hearing.
 
No your not,you had your say with the supermods and when I/we tried to put our side we are jumped on,he's never going to get any fair hearing.

Like you haven't had your say on various threads. Give your head a shake. What part of not jy decision don't you get? I reversed my original ban to keep things fair as you made a valid point and I'm still accused of bias and bullying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OLOF
Status
Not open for further replies.