You’ve spent too much time listening to JGF wiz, you’ve beginning to sound like him, your just missing the multiple colours !
Best nonsense I've heard all day...
have a San Miguel Starmer Cleared
- Thread starter wizered
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Best nonsense I've heard all day... have a San Miguel 
I’m in Benalmádena right now - off to Fuengirola tomorrow followed by Torremolinos, then a trip to Nerja on Monday.
I love this place. Plenty of San Miguel to go around (although I prefer Mahou or Estrella - or even Alhambra if not drinking a lot - Alhambra is strong but nice!!!)
if you look them up with the date labour broke the rules. curry and beer is not necessary for work as an excuse, nobody needs a ****ing beer to work!!
whats the problem people stuck to the rules many at cost to themselves while labour members including its leader had a jolly with pals. not for them behaviour you expect from tories. labour need to be better!!
The Durham Labour Constabulary found Starmer not to have done anything wrong.
There's a shock
There's a shock
Funny that, that’s exactly what I thought when I read you previous post, mine’s a real ale 
so everyone who had a beer during lockdown was breaking the rules?, , get real, if that was used as a yardstick Boris would have had at least a dozen FPN’s, the devil is in the detail , and Labour have been found to have been within the rules.They would have done their homework before the meeting, and known they were within them, for that reason I’d have been shocked had they been found to have broken them, unlike Boris who doesn’t think any rules apply to him, he thinks he’s above the rules.
Have a good one mate, I'm down in Cornwall and I will enjoy a Stella and maybe even a little malt later..
Just as you predicted, fantastic couple of days so far thankyou.
They had all the facts to make a decision, something you haven’t got, they are also not biased, which you are, but in your mind neither of these facts make any difference.
IN THIS DAY AND AGE you had better check ... might find it is your uncle who is the Aunt ....
An associate stated that the local police would have most likely had officers in attendance during the day, even in plain clothes looking out for KS! ] and what if a couple of them were at the party having a bottle on duty and likely one of them doing the driving
They would have done their homework before the meeting, and known they were within them, for that reason I’d have been shocked had they been found to have broken them, unlike Boris who doesn’t think any rules apply to him, he thinks he’s above the rules.
Thats not what the poster referred to. As you point out the devil is in the detail. What were the rules at that time? You have not answered. A cursory look at the rules for April cross referencing the evidenced behaviours it is hard to see how the rules were not broken, unless the people in pictures were mannequins.
If Labour had done their homework, they would have avoided looking like scummy hypocrites. Last May one of my support worker colleagues died of covid, just days after Labours jolly gathering. The optics to working people here are awful. Authority looks after itself, authority in the police looked after another elite in Labour.
My point was I’ve no need to check the rules as I don’t have all the evidence, therefore I’m unable to make a proper assessment. I assume you aren’t in possession of the evidence either. I made the point that the police are the only ones that have everything, and have twice concluded that the rules weren’t broken.
My point about the devil being in the detail was pointing out that without all the evidence, it would be impossible to draw a conclusion.
To be as unequivocal as you have been I would have expected yourself to cross reference the date x the specific covid ruling ad verbatim.
I draw one. As an individual who wrote covid risk assessments and policy for services, I will provide this conclusion. Labour broke the rules on social distancing. The excuse about necessary food is truly comical. Any competant risk assessor would have ensured what occurred colud not happen due to simply asking people to eat at differing times, that they were seen quaffing post 11am, yeah righto you were working.
They think laws and rules dont apply to them because they are better, sadly with Labour laws were for the many, not their few, they are right.
I don’t need to, I trust the proper authorities to do it.
I assume in order to do risk assessments you’d need all the relevant information, yet you make a judgement of guilt without all the relevant information, very odd.