Stan

We all know how this works - brb bans only those who are intellectually superior to him, but shows clemency to those who are at his level or below and who cravenly beg for mercy. We’ve seen that with the likes of Pixie and Skiddy.

The likes of you, me, Spurly, Libby, Sky and even Stan don’t stand a chance, Tobias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Will he be coming back?

It’s not as if anyone has sprung to his defence. Even the ‘Pede has remained silent.

The likes of me and me Bredrin (Spurly) still have a pop at brb for what he has done (or, rather, omitted to do) to encourage Libby and Sky to desert this board; but we haven’t had a peep out of Stan’s beloved ‘Pede.

What would be the point in his returning?

..
Would the "omitted to so be another ban request for other posters , perchance? ... can you be clear.

... and Libby was posting on the Prem board yesterday. ... so life does go on.

Finally, Sky hasn't left the board because of what happened with your personal stuff... he left in a bit of a rage because brb targetted him personally ... again, let's be clear.

I know you like to think that it's all about you ... but it really isn't <ok>
 
Will he be coming back?

It’s not as if anyone has sprung to his defence. Even the ‘Pede has remained silent.

The likes of me and me Bredrin (Spurly) still have a pop at brb for what he has done (or, rather, omitted to do) to encourage Libby and Sky to desert this board; but we haven’t had a peep out of Stan’s beloved ‘Pede.

What would be the point in his returning?

Maybe it is because

1) Stan broke the rules, so it was a legitimate banning, then he broke rules further by trying to infiltrate the site again under sock accounts.

2) The "Pede" dont have the Spurs fan mentality where an ageing, balding, musician of advanced years who makes a constant **** of himself, needs everything he says or does to be validated and/or defended by an even older Ex-pat or a 30 year old, weed smoking, man whore, Muslim.

3) In your experience, would anyone speaking out actually change brb's mind? Does he seem that sort of fellow?
 
Maybe it is because

1) Stan broke the rules, so it was a legitimate banning, then he broke rules further by trying to infiltrate the site again under sock accounts.

2) The "Pede" dont have the Spurs fan mentality where an ageing, balding, musician of advanced years who makes a constant **** of himself, needs everything he says or does to be validated and/or defended by an even older Ex-pat or a 30 year old, weed smoking, man whore, Muslim.

3) In your experience, would anyone speaking out actually change brb's mind? Does he seem that sort of fellow?

Funny though right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
What makes you say that Stan is sound, I've always got on with him and thought that most do?

Stan has left Quents crying with his pants pulled down on many occasions ... those that have done it frequently have been collectively labelled the 'pede' (well initially 'pded' - which was the funniest thing about it, by far) ... those that apply the savlon to his stinging arse he has labelled 'bredrin' ... for some strange reason <laugh>
 
This is Stan’s second stint in the Cooler. He’ll be twice the man.

I know.

I’ve done two stints in the Cooler, and I am so different now, compared with how I used to be.
 
Maybe it is because

1) Stan broke the rules, so it was a legitimate banning, then he broke rules further by trying to infiltrate the site again under sock accounts.

2) The "Pede" dont have the Spurs fan mentality where an ageing, balding, musician of advanced years who makes a constant **** of himself, needs everything he says or does to be validated and/or defended by an even older Ex-pat or a 30 year old, weed smoking, man whore, Muslim.

3) In your experience, would anyone speaking out actually change brb's mind? Does he seem that sort of fellow?

<laugh>
You’re taking all of this far more seriously than I ever have!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock