You should write this as a sketch, maybe get John Cleese and the 2 Ronnies to perform it . Obviously tricky now one of them's dead.
Look at your sig, bless Money/advertising is not split equally between all the PL teams, never has been. And not every club receives in excess of £100m from UEFA each season.
There's a couple of comedians on your board who could do it. Actually, it would probably go over their heads. Chucklevision is their level
not sure what you are laughing at. You had me banned from your board because, I assume I pointed out how Chelsea have often outspent United before and after you won the lottery. Or the Mourinho wind ups. I hope that wasnt the reason And who said its split equally? There has to be some incentive to succeed. Do you think Usain Bolt gets the same amount as the guy who finishes last? What about if he i running in a european athletics meeting and some other guy isnt running. Should the other guy get an equal share? See this is what I dont get about you and anyone else who says money isnt shared fairly. Its the fairest in europe for starters. The club who finishes bottom of the PL gets more money than most clubs who win their league. Teams who dont play in europe also dont get any money from UEFA. Why should they anyway. Correct me if I am wrong but in your ideal world you would like it like this... All monies are shared equally between all top clubs. Finishing position plys no part in th rewards at the end of the season ( apart from the trophy of course ) All clubs should receive an equal share of the monies paid by UEFA. Qualification to europe isnt necessary. If thats not what you are saying DL, then what exactly is it you are trying to say?
You were banned ages ago for being a WUM, so then created another account to try and bypass the ban. Comparing a team sport to an individual sport is just pure idiocy.
Oh is it? Please do explain. I am not sure why its ok to reward winners and not the losers in athletics but not football. And I have never been banned from your board. My other account was banned for a joke by Hash to see if it worked and he didnt know how to unban it so I made another one.
I'll put it simply. There are far less variables in individual sport. The fitter, faster, stronger, better athlete will win barring injury or change in conditions. If I challenged Usain Bolt to a 100m race, I would lose every single time. If I challenged him and 10 of his mates to a game of football with 10 of mine, the outcome becomes far less predictable. Whether Usain Bolt or Rory Mcilroy earn £10m or £100m more than their competitors in an event makes no difference, if a football club does thus allowing them to sign better athletes (off their competitors) then it's to the detriment of fair competition.
So..... winners are ruining football. Interesting viewpoint DL, not one I share but interesting all the same. One thing and sorry to be a thorn in your side. What about the years before 1992...... when clubs were buying off their competitors for ever increasing fee's. I mean it didnt take all that long to go from £1000 to £1million did it and back then clubs relied on gate receipt ( see, if it was like that now.... United would still have more money ) and on field success............ which is essentially what happens now. The more successful you are the more money you get. I see nothing wrong with that, sure its hard to break into that successful bracket properly but why shouldnt it be? Clubs should work hard to be successful not expect it to be handed to them.
Copenhagen, BATE Borisov, Olympiakos & Shaktar Donetsk are just 4 examples of UEFA money killing fair competition in their leagues. Nobody else can compete because of the extra money UEFA are pumping in to those clubs each season. The same will happen with City, United, Chelsea and Arsenal in this league.
Looking for a few facts on last season, how did Spurs and gooners get on against top five clubs last season?
Perhaps UIR & DL could carry on their little spat on their own boards rather than bringing it on here
There's not much I can do when he is following me on every board to provoke me, you only need to look at his sig. I genuinely came here to discuss the topic of the thread. Apologies if harm done
Lying chav ****. You were asked to stop before and decided to carry on. You should be banned from the gunner board, you insidious little prick. http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/213928-Spurs-Ultimately-What-IS-the-Point-of-Them/page3 Thanks
You are an outright liar. Taking the piss out of other teams isn't my style. Not really in the position to given what's gone on at my club over the last 6-9 months. Not 606 is a forum where you engage with people that support different clubs to your own, if you don't like it I'd suggest you go to an exclusively Arsenal forum, people such as yourself and COYG would love it there. And also, Please find me a post where I've "taken the piss" out of Arsenal or Spurs on ANY board, I'm here all day for an apology P.S Here's the links to all my previous posts: http://www.not606.com/search.php?searchid=2145801
Ah yes. Here's me slagging off Arsenal on the Chelsea board. http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/212682-Arsenal-strongly-linked-with-Jovetic Oh... Part of being on a community like not606 is having respect for members irrespective of who they support. If you are incapable of that you really have no place on an open forum like this, IMO. Compulsive liar by the looks of it too.
