I predict 21,500 attendance. The greedy bastard can be blamed for this. Just about to settle down and watch it on SKY with my nice cup of tea and a bacon banjo sarnie.
You're calling our owner a greedy bastard while paying money to the bloke who owns Sky and pretty much football in England or at least has it by the balls?
I pay £16 per month and I get everything. Today at £35 means over 2 months of sky. I go to the £16 games as I believe they are good value. £35 for a game is a rip off hence why there were 2,000 empty seats.
I am happy with the price of SKY. I got rid of it a year ago because it was too high. When they begged me to come back I only went back because the price shot down. I get better value from my £16 a month sky subscription than £35 for 90 minutes. The last 40 minutes of that being spoilt by an over zealous linesman, So you see fella I decide what is a fair price and what is not. £35 is most certainly not.
I got it wrong didn't I. They are of course the same thing. My sarnie was very nice at the time but the sending off put a bad taste in my mouth.
I have a friend who's 23 year old son has only managed to get a 16 hour a week job on minimum wage since leaving College. That £35 plus costs to get him to the ground (he can't afford a car) would take almost half a weeks earnings, huge City fan or not he simply cannot afford to go
I would say that Sky is a rip off, but for £35 with Sky you get 10080 minutes of varied entertainment each week rather than 90 minutes of suffering you get as a City fan for the same price
I pay £16 a month mate and I get everything. I do not have every room coverage and I do not have HD. I think £16 is fantastic value for the variety you get. Also, it isn't just £35 to go to a game. Unless you live down Walton Street there is also the travel costs. The cost without drinks food programme etc is closer to £40. If City receive only 7% of their revenue through admission prices it is not going to hurt the club by reducing the prices.
