So the club were informed

Probably the main reason. That and taking the opportunity to have a swipe at the club.

 

His last post before the "Johnson" ones was last May - He has come on this board purely to have a a swipe and wind people up

 

These folk who keep referring to AJ`s original police statement amaze me. I`d love to know how they got copies of it.

 

Didn't you know mate, it's available to everyone? Employers, Supporters the lot!!!

 

200 posts in 5 years, nothing since last May and then suddenly back on here to wum.

I'm guessing regular enforced breaks care of HMP.

 

I have kept out of this re: the case/club involvement (at least as far as I can remember ) because I think its better to get the full facts before commenting plus there is still a trial going on. The club cannot issue a statement until its all over so best just to wait and see.

 

Pretentious prick! Charmed I'm sure. You may dissect every word I say and take it literally if you want. The point I was trying to make, was, this has put your ****ty little club in the limelight for all the wrong reasons.

 

I'm free to post when I want thanks. I don't normally bother coming on here any more but I did feel compelled to vent about the situation as I see it. Sorry if this doesn't sit well with you but hey, it's a free country!

 

This is like groundhog day

You are just pretending to be as thick as ****, aren't you

please log in to view this image

Neebody's this thick

Thanks for the laugh, marra

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

You're just after attention, that you obviously don't usually get, aren't you
You got it

 

Aye, 200 posts in 5 years & about 50 of them are on this thread.

 

And there we have the real reason for your posts.

Nothing to do with legal or moral. Simply opportunistic black and white animosity.

 

PS I've never heard that about Papisse Cisse. If true, that is thoroughly disgusting

Not true. I only said that to join in with your name calling. I thought I'd come down to your level.

 

Tara

 

SAFC isn't a person. It's a company. It has ethical and legal guidelines to adhere to not Moral ones.

As said, even if the club did knew it hands were tied by the not guilty plea. You've pressed on a good point there. Commercial. Adidas(his sponsor) would have dropped him firist chance if they could have too? Both SAFC and Adidas both sacked him at the first legal opportunity. When he changed his plea to guilty on the first day of the trial.

I think there's bags of information which points or SAFC and any other group or organisation who had a contract with AJ, being restricted from a legal stand point imo.

 

You didn't hear that Cisse raped, impregnated and married a 13 year old girl, lied on legal documentation to cover it up? Then abandoned the girl and his child while perused his career as a full time cheat and part time footballer. There, was full expose. The girl gave interviews, the evidence published.

Wow. How uninformed are you?

 

Selective vision & sight.

 

Ethically the correct thing to do was uphold employment laws and uphold the players rights in light of his plea. We were 100% percent Ethical. Do you really think Sacking a man without investigation who's legally innocent is ethical? Dude, I would not work for you.

 

Good point about his sponsors. Forgot all about them. Tarnishing their brand? Reputation wise they would want rid asap.

 

Well said.

 

Tell you one thing mind, reading the Prosecutor's closing statement, she is pretty good. It'll be interesting to read the defence response now.