Prove it was me, if not I'd appreciate yoyou not naming me I your posts as guilty. I'll call the police and take you to court.
Mate someone's having a massive laugh at your expense here. Like I said I don't give a ****, but no one likes a grass so how bout you pm me who accused me and I can call them out on my own behalf. I'll need that screenshot though as I can't take any ones word on here I'm sure I understand.
Nice try, Lee. If I get my hands on that screenshot, everyone will see it, because I will make it public and the blow the whole lid of this entire nest of vipers. I will do that after having removed all traces of the whistle-blower, of course. The bloke would be a hero, in my eyes, and the eyes of every decent poster on this entire site. Not so much the snake who is caught, red handed, telling all the other key-holders that he'd given you the password to make the cyber attack.
I think you should just be grateful you still have access to your bank account Les as there's some ****ing wrong un's out there.
Prove what? That I don't have the screenshot? One cannot prove a negative, LHS. But, of course, you and a small select circle of others know that I am telling true about what went down. The purpose of the screenshot is merely to let everyone else know that you were given the VB password by a certain snake (who I would love to see unmasked). It would, of course, be more honourable for the snake to do the decent thing and to confess, and then take his time in the Cooler. Rather than be dragged from his hole, to cravenly cower in the glare of exposure. In the meantime, if I get my hands on that screenshot, you'll be the first to know, Sucky. Along with everyone else.
For a lawyer your concept of proof is funny. A screenshot of someonesomeonee saying they gave me the vb account. Does not prove anything apart from someone said they did. So you can apologise to me in your own time when you realise that mate.
I'm not accusing you of having posting my personal data on this board, Sucky. I have no way of telling whether you did or you didn't. If you didn't, then you have taken the fall for the coward that did. All I am telling people is what has been told to me - that someone (named to me) has a screenshot of a PM from someone (also named to me) to the collective (all named to me) who were behind the VB, and the PM contains confirmation of that person telling the others that he gave you the VB password in order to make post my personal data on this forum. Like you, I want to get my hands on that screenshot.
Right so until you can prove it was me (which you cant), how about you name the **** who allegedly gave me the vb account. What's the problem with doing that? I take it it's onr of the sock six? Which are?
No, but I haven't gone down that line of enquiry. I'm not sure if my source has seen the screenshot. I doubt it, because he would have let me have it, I am sure. Therefore, I am presuming that he knows only exactly what he was told, being what he has been told by the person who has the screenshot. However, the question you ask is an interesting one, and I would very much like to know if there is an answer to it.
All sounds a bit distant, to me. Someone who's heard from someone who's seen the screenshot has pointed the finger at Sucky? That's a lot of opportunity for people to either get it wrong or bullshit you, in my opinion.
Nice try, Sucky. I do admire your attempts at trying to play me. I bear you no grudges for attempting to do that. Trust me, I would love nothing more than to name the person whom I have been told made the PM (and which the screenshot allegedly captures), but you will appreciate my caution. It is the entire reason why I want the screenshot.
