Well you are ****ed then .sky's already there.
Also you are one of the pded
Sweet, that means the pded have won at not606

Well you are ****ed then .sky's already there.
Also you are one of the pded

you mean its 4 pages long and has no funnys in it?
![]()
Well you are ****ed then .sky's already there.
Also you are one of the pded
i though they all worked at the bbc and it was some peedo ring thing?Piskie's dead, i think.
See hiags never annoyed me or pissed me off, in fact from my viewpoint weve always got on very well.
so piskies clearly wumming the **** out of the lot of you
all hail the new wum master![]()
^^^so much weed hes gone parraThis was a coded message with a very sinister twist...wow, the plot thickens

i though they all worked at the bbc and it was some peedo ring thing?
Didn’t read.Let’s clear something up once and for all, because I am growing tired of your continually misrepresenting the facts.
“The truth would destroy you” was aimed at you and you alone, some while back , when I was ripping you to shreds on a number of issues.
Your only, and rather pathetic, line of attack was to question my intellect, my job status, and my musical talents. You wummed hard on those issues.
Given the fact that I enjoy a very comfortable lifestyle, with a professional qualification, am a graduate of Cambridge University, and a fairly accomplished semi-pro musician, I told you that “the truth would destroy you,” which it clearly has, despite what you say to the contrary. In fact, I made that very comment in the spirit of banter, not to brag, but to wum. If you had refrained from making personal attacks on me, at that time, on those issues, I would never have felt the need to justify myself, whether in jest or otherwise.
Everything else - and I do mean everything - was added on to keep ramping up the ante, and to keep winding you up. In that objective I have been 100% successful.
In the meantime, and over the intervening years, we’ve seen a clutch of some real nasty characters latching onto our spat. You’ve encouraged it, of course, because these knuckleheads are fighting your corner for you. For some of them, I clearly represent some failure or sexual dysfunction in their lives, because the vitriol with which they have met my obvious banter has bordered on the obsessive and psychotic.
It is this nasty element, encouraged by you and idiots like Bambi and Stan, that has led us to where we are now.
I have been in fairly close contact with Sky, and I have encouraged him to post, yet he remains adamant that he has lost all interest in this forum, for reasons that others have already accurately described. I am aware that quite a few of the lads have formed a social media group - Twitter, Watsap, or whatever - which I have been invited to join. My work commitments haven’t permitted me the time to look into that, just yet, but I will get round to it.
I’m sure that there will be a strong core of us who will continue to keep in touch, regardless of what happens here, and that may well be the reason why Sky isn’t fussed about coming back, and why Libby isn’t fussed about posting on this board.
You can cut it anyway you want, Pix, and justify it in whatever way makes you feel good about yourself, but you are part of the reason that Sky won’t post. I’m not saying that you are the only reason, or even the major reason, but you are a part of it.
Pded was HIAG's comfort blanket. The only way he could cope with random people across the forum all taking the piss out of him was to construct a story that I was the ringleader of an organised cabal that I'd brainwashed to all go after him.
Mwha ha ha ha
Nope ... not a word ... QuentinLet’s clear something up once and for all, because I am growing tired of your continually misrepresenting the facts.
“The truth would destroy you” was aimed at you and you alone, some while back , when I was ripping you to shreds on a number of issues.
Your only, and rather pathetic, line of attack was to question my intellect, my job status, and my musical talents. You wummed hard on those issues.
Given the fact that I enjoy a very comfortable lifestyle, with a professional qualification, am a graduate of Cambridge University, and a fairly accomplished semi-pro musician, I told you that “the truth would destroy you,” which it clearly has, despite what you say to the contrary. In fact, I made that very comment in the spirit of banter, not to brag, but to wum. If you had refrained from making personal attacks on me, at that time, on those issues, I would never have felt the need to justify myself, whether in jest or otherwise.
Everything else - and I do mean everything - was added on to keep ramping up the ante, and to keep winding you up. In that objective I have been 100% successful.
In the meantime, and over the intervening years, we’ve seen a clutch of some real nasty characters latching onto our spat. You’ve encouraged it, of course, because these knuckleheads are fighting your corner for you. For some of them, I clearly represent some failure or sexual dysfunction in their lives, because the vitriol with which they have met my obvious banter has bordered on the obsessive and psychotic.
It is this nasty element, encouraged by you and idiots like Bambi and Stan, that has led us to where we are now.
I have been in fairly close contact with Sky, and I have encouraged him to post, yet he remains adamant that he has lost all interest in this forum, for reasons that others have already accurately described. I am aware that quite a few of the lads have formed a social media group - Twitter, Watsap, or whatever - which I have been invited to join. My work commitments haven’t permitted me the time to look into that, just yet, but I will get round to it.
I’m sure that there will be a strong core of us who will continue to keep in touch, regardless of what happens here, and that may well be the reason why Sky isn’t fussed about coming back, and why Libby isn’t fussed about posting on this board.
You can cut it anyway you want, Pix, and justify it in whatever way makes you feel good about yourself, but you are part of the reason that Sky won’t post. I’m not saying that you are the only reason, or even the major reason, but you are a part of it.



Let’s clear something up once and for all, because I am growing tired of your continually misrepresenting the facts.
“The truth would destroy you” was aimed at you and you alone, some while back , when I was ripping you to shreds on a number of issues.
You've got some front. If people have to read yours then the least you can do is return the favour once in a whileNope ... not a word ... Quentin![]()
Actually, it says the reverse, Sucky.