Please show me where i have defended Costa and please, you've been defending Suarez more times than you've been arguing about conspiracy theories. As for your picture - Yes, looking down check, feet onto someones body check - pictures always look worse. http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01342/steven-gerrard_pa_1342719c.jpg To reiterate Costa is as dirty and scummy as suarez and i'm not a fan. IF I was a liverpool fan though i'd start bragging about how he's our ****
How? What Costa did was cowardly and sly, its an opinion not an invitation to have a straightener with the ****, I suppose you can fight and beat all the players you have an opinion about.
i'd take costa no problem..... he's a sly pussy and he did nothing for spain in barzil as he hid there. he's got his 3 match ban so i'm sure that'll help cheslea's call.
No, but then I don't accuse people of being cowards when I'm not capable of matching them either. Anyone can sit behind a keyboard and make such ridiculous statements. Nothing to do with having a straightener.
Sorry blueman, but i'm going to have to side with PMK, he's open to his own opinion. I would probably say coward is the wrong word... Sly definitely, dirty sure coward... dunno its not like he's backing out of a fight
He's entitled to his opinion but it's a bit like someone who calls a boxer a bum when they would never get into a ring with them.
Bobby, blueman seems to think Costa is a hardcase, that's his opinion and he's entitled to it and as you say I'm entitled to mine. But this "you wouldn't say it to his face" is daft,
Bet there's plenty of posters on this site that would and are capable of chopping up Costa or any other player you care to mention, are they entitled to call him a "coward"?
Fair enough but let's face it, if you had won last night then you wouldn't even be talking about Diego. Skrtel gave it the big one and got it back with interest.
Thing is mate if the ref had seen the Can incident he'd have sent him off(as he confirmed earlier)and the penalty incident or him standing on Skrtel's leg wouldn't have happened. We don't benefit from his ban but Chelsea did from having the extra man.
Ha. Keep telling yourself that and you may even believe it. Extra man? You would know all about that. We played at 60%of our capability in both legs. You were at your best. We still beat you. Wembley here we come. Love it.
Try reading what I've actually said on the issue as opposed to what you think I have, you gnat brained idiot Costa was bang out of order there's no defence for what he did, proper snide. The irony is a tool like you bleating about it when you spent hour after hour defending a ****er who was far worse. It's laughable in both it's idiocy and it's predictability. ****ing hypocrite
tobes is right it is quite ironic..... but then he is just bitter so anything that damages lfc is seemn as good to our tobes. far far too much whine and cheese going on today
Why the silly percentages, if the ref had have seen it Chelsea would have been a man/coward down for most of the game, the outcome of the game isn't the point, the point is he should have gone after the stamp on Can.
