Should we keep O'Neill?

Spot on with the cm there damage, I'd have liked Huddleston's before hull got to him but we only need 1 more cm if we get granero and Faurlin back.

 

Its a yes from me, maybe not as a starter but as suitable back up across the back four.

 

Get rid asap.

Simply not good enough for the PL.

 

I'd love to see us go for Thorne - Derby think they have a chance of buying him. If WBA want to sell, we should go in for him.

 

he's not a defender. Is that you arry?

 

A very average championship standard player, so not good enough

 

Don't agree.

I like Henry for what he does, but I think O'Neill is a better player than him.

Keep for a year.

 

Sorry Flyer the sun got to me, mixed him up with Hughes, i would still keep him for sentimental reasons.

 

Keep him for 1 year.

If even as a thanks for his critical foul which denied Derby a certain goal which probably would have given them the momentum to go on and win the game.

 

Damage, I answered your post the other night but you've not replied.

Surprise surprise...

 

Not for me in the Premier league, need more quality than that

 

Has this anything to do with this thread?

 

I heard O'Neil in a radio interview just after he signed last year and he said Harry had told him he wouldn't play every game and would be used anywhere across the midfield, he said he was happy to get game-time and would play wherever he was asked. Obviously, it went exactly as he said. He has his limitations but is reliable and worth another year as a squad player...

 

This.

And this.

 

I agree

 

We should keep him as part of our squad with a one year contract at a sensible salary.

 

This.

Also, am i alone in thinking he was by far our best player in the first half at Wembley?

 

agree 100%!

 

Keep him, see how he goes in the prem for a season, then review at the end of next season.

 

You shouldn't be reading The Sun anyway!