1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

'Should haig's ban be reinsated?'

Discussion in 'Chelsea' started by Robby202, Aug 5, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


  1. Robbie, this has already been put to your board and they voted me back. DL was true to his word and reinstated me, in accordance with the democratic decision that was made.

    The fact that you (and a couple of others) do not like the decision that was made has been made patently evident ever since, with your continual abuse of me and attempts to disrupt threads and debates, which, quite frankly, undermines DL and the democratic decision that was made.

    You are a Grade One idiot, a petulant child, and a very nasty piece of work. You abuse this board and the decent people who post on it. If there was ever a case for banning anyone, you make out that case every time you vent your spleen and bile, and with the gushing of every obscenity you publish.
     
    #21


  2. I grew up in Tottenham, went to Tottenham Comprehensive, and watched my very first home game at the Lane in 1969, as a toddler. I think my first Spurs kit was purchased for me, one Christmas, when I was 9.

    With brain-washing like that, there really wasn't much hope for me supporting any other team.
     
    #22
  3. Robby202

    Robby202 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,188
    Likes Received:
    181
    Please keep on topic Wum boy, we are talking about the merits of your wummish behavior.
     
    #23
  4. CFC: Champs £launderx17

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    19,665
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Then why do you have no understanding of football? I don't believe you.

    How much did it cost to stand on the shelf or Paxton and which Chelsea games did you go to?
     
    #24
  5. PINKIE

    PINKIE Wurzel Gummidge

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    123,801
    Likes Received:
    71,930
    To be fair, when HIAG posts his BS it's usually met with a witty take down. But he doesn't like, because it doesn't get the reaction he's after and that's when we see him throw his toys out of the pram and start accusing people of stalking / harrasing / being nasty to him etc. If he actually was any good with the banter, i.e. give and take - it would be fine, but HIAG's trouble is that he's just not a very good wum and wants the wumming to be all one way. I've said it a plenty of times before:
    If you can't take it, then don't dish it. If you do, then you have to expect to have some dished back your way.
     
    #25
  6. Robby202

    Robby202 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,188
    Likes Received:
    181
    What a plonker you are Hiag straight in with personal abuse, you're just making it easier for those who can do do what they should have done before.
     
    #26
  7. Chelsea Pensioner

    Chelsea Pensioner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,382
    Likes Received:
    1,382
    Nice try HIAG !!!!!
    Can I suggest that when baited, say nothing in return?? Both the one having a crack AND all the rest of us will get seriously pissed off at the wind ups, and the Mods will act.
    They are doing a good job and in this case, are on your side. It's down to you now, keep it interesting and funny and you should have no problems.
     
    #27


  8. Sorry, but why should personal insults and cyber-bullying ever be tolerated?

    No one should make excuses for it.

    Merely because the likes of Robbie don't like what I write (or has a complete inability to understand my humour) ought not to excuse him or those like him making the vile comments that he does.

    He is your problem not me.
     
    #28
  9. <doh>
    Oh, the irony!
     
    #29
  10. The Ginger Marks

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    40,564
    Likes Received:
    16,202
    I don't see it as so, I think it's very much in the balance especially as he is now using personal abuse.

    But your advice is good in the main, he should keep it light and abstain from wumming.
     
    #30


  11. <doh>
    So says the mod-wum whose arse has been owned more times than Marc Almond's.
     
    #31

  12. ...and Robbie, Ozzie (and particularly the mod-wum known as PESKIE) should be warned that their anti-social behaviour and continued attacks will be met with zero-tolerance, followed by lengthy bans.
     
    #32
  13. CFC: Champs £launderx17

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    19,665
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Mystic smeg: you have had an hour to answer. Which spurs games did you go to in the 70s. How much did it cost to get in? Where did you stand?

    Also, your spurs kit in 69 you mention. Which one? How much? Which shop did you get it in?

    Also your first home game in 69. Who played? Where did you stand etc?

    Come on. I am sure you can google a fake fan history
     
    #33
  14. The Ginger Marks

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    40,564
    Likes Received:
    16,202
    Why should that be hiag? They wasn't like it before you emerged as the new forum public enemy.

    You should embrace the opportunity that DL has given you yet it seems all you want to do is carry on from when you forced me & Drogs to ban you.

    Just ease off lad or it won't end well for you.
     
    #34
  15. I've purposely ignored you. Please take the hint.
    <ok>
     
    #35


  16. <laugh>
    Jesus! You really don't give up, do you, Skiddy?
     
    #36
  17. CFC: Champs £launderx17

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    19,665
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Because you never went near the lane in the 70s
     
    #37

  18. You're right. I made it all up.
     
    #38
  19. Varier2

    Varier2 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,109
    Likes Received:
    37
    I think this topic has done its time. I don't want to mop up the mess. If you have any complaints just PM me and I'll be happy to talk it over. <ok>
     
    #39
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page