1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should Balioteli get a retrospective 3 match ban for his vicious stamp on Parker?

Discussion in 'Tottenham Hotspur' started by Hoddle is a god, Jan 22, 2012.

?

Should that thug Balioteli be banned by the FA for his stamp on Parker?

  1. Yes (because he is a thug)

  2. No (because I am an idiot and cannot see)

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Jamrag

    Jamrag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,549
    Likes Received:
    167
    Can you manage the England team while doing a 3 stretch in Wormwood Scrubs?
     
    #121
  2. BackStabbed

    BackStabbed Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    How was he not moaning about it? Did you not see his after-match interview?
     
    #122
  3. Spurlock

    Spurlock Homeboy Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    74,844
    Likes Received:
    90,665
    How is that a 'moan??

    it was a legitimate observation backed up by facts on the pitch!!


    go and look up what 'to moan' means before you come on here and start moaning<ok>
     
    #123
  4. BackStabbed

    BackStabbed Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your actually a idiot, how am i moaning i'm glad Balotelli got banned it was deserved i'm just saying it was expected that he'd get charged because Redknapp was moaning about it and the FA has to bow to the pressure. It was a legitimate observation but he was ranting about it saying how bad it was and how it shouldn't be allowed and mario this mario that blah blah blah hence moaning about it
     
    #124
  5. Chav & Gooner wums will not like the fact that Baloteli has been charged by the FA because it is irrefutable proof that Spurs was robbed of 3 points by incompetent refereeing yet again, and it makes them look like utter fools when they attempt their pathetic wummery.
     
    #125


  6. <doh>

    You're actually illiterate, pal.
     
    #126

  7. Jamrag

    Jamrag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,549
    Likes Received:
    167
    I repeat - is being charged equal to being guilty?
     
    #127
  8. Spurlock

    Spurlock Homeboy Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    74,844
    Likes Received:
    90,665
    you do realise that Redknapp is the manager of spurs..so he is entitled to give his opinion

    We are Spur's fans so we can have an opinion

    it didnt effect your team..yet your on here saying HR was moaning...of course you are entitled to an opinion on anything..but to me it seems your moaning about Redknapp opening his mouth...so what was the alternative?

    it is hard to take it on the chin when you feel that someone else's incompetence has cost us vital points...

    2 of thier 3 goal scorers should have been back in the changing rooms soaping each other up long before the final whistle<ok>
     
    #128


  9. How many times have you heard of a player being acquitted when the FA has laid a charge? I cannot think of one case. The FA tends only to charge a player when it is certain that an offence has been committed. Only a blind and bitter wum could fail to see that Baloteli stamped on Parker's head.
     
    #129
  10. BackStabbed

    BackStabbed Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    So only Spurs fans can have a opinion? Mate you need to re-read what i actually wrote then and stop thinking any non-tottenham fan that comes on here is wumming, We've all been ****ed up by refs,I agree he should of been sent off all i'm saying is it was never in doubt the FA would charge him because Redknapp was moaning and they will take that complaint seriously just like they do when any other big manager moans. This is my last post on the matter because i'm not arguing over a decision we both agree on lol, this was in my opinion the moaning redknapp done, and why the FA had to charge Balotelli to investigate the incident and look further into the matters Redknapp brought up:
    It has no place in football. He should have been off. <-- Moaning that he wern't sent off
    "It is not the first time he's done that is it? I'm sure the FA will look at it &#8212; they must do, mustn't they? <- Moaning that his done it before and saying the FA has to look at it, that's not really a opinion on the matter because his bringing up Balotellis previous and basically ordering what the FA should do.
    Anyway a 4 match ban looks on the horizon now
     
    #130
  11. Spurlock

    Spurlock Homeboy Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    74,844
    Likes Received:
    90,665
    so what else could it possibly equate to in your wisdom??

    no doubt you will have years of experience behind you from listening to Wenger's lame excuses, when you tackle this simple question.
     
    #131
  12. NotSoMightyEastbourneBoro

    NotSoMightyEastbourneBoro Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    698
    Likes Received:
    249
    What kind of ****ing low-life dives like a drama queen when his team are already 2-0 up? You are playing one of the most popular sports currently in the world and getting paid millions for the pleasure. You are adored and idolised around the world yet still behave like a pathetic, spoilt, cheating child. Oh. It's Torres who plays for Chelsea and Spain. That's probably why. God! Footballers are a bunch of scum-sucking arseholes.
     
    #132
  13. Spurlock

    Spurlock Homeboy Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    74,844
    Likes Received:
    90,665
    i actually did say your entitled to an opinion,if you read what i put, but your comments lost credibility to me when you said that redknapp was 'moaning' as that to me says that you come into this debate with a biased slant...i dont mean to argue...im just trying to come across neautral fans from other rival teams that can actually be impartial about this...for me if i am to be impartial i simply ask myself this

    'how would i react if it happened to a spurs player?'


    that is all:emoticon-0150-hands
     
    #133
  14. No Kane No Gain

    No Kane No Gain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,582
    Likes Received:
    3,483
    Have you seen Mean Machine? :D
     
    #134
  15. Jamrag

    Jamrag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,549
    Likes Received:
    167
    So you are saying that being charged is equal to being guilty - yes or no? It isn't a difficult question lol
     
    #135
  16. Jamrag

    Jamrag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,549
    Likes Received:
    167
    lol :p
     
    #136
  17. NSIS

    NSIS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    36,067
    Likes Received:
    14,555
    Oh! Do **** off. Harry ain't Whinger. He complained because he had every right to complain. That low life sack of **** deliberately kicked Parker in the head, and to add insult to injury, he gets, and scores the penalty that wins the game when he should have been sat in the dressing room. I'd love to see Whinger's reaction if hat happened to him, he'd bust a ****ing blood vessel!
     
    #137
  18. deedub93

    deedub93 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    12,700
    Likes Received:
    8,707
    Well all the Goon and Chav WUMS seem to think that because Harry has been charged he is guilty. Me I'll wait for the Jurys verdict. With the Baliotelli case I have seen the evidence with my own eyes, I think he is guilty but again we have to wait for the FA's verdict.
     
    #138
  19. I think Baloteli is as guilty as an erection on a harem eunuch.
     
    #139
  20. totsfan

    totsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,317
    Likes Received:
    122
    he's getting a 4 game ban according to today's new's
     
    #140

Share This Page