Just saw that aswell. The Chairman sounds as if he is expecting the worse and so trying to drum up interest and get a bidding war going on.
what, get as many clubs as possible to bid the same amount?
Just saw that aswell. The Chairman sounds as if he is expecting the worse and so trying to drum up interest and get a bidding war going on.
what, get as many clubs as possible to bid the same amount?

Yep £3m + £3m + £3m = Billy Sharp sold for £10m. Is that right Beddy?
In all seriousness, i meant that if he (the chairman) is making it well known that clubs can bid £3m and talk to Sharp then he may have more interest. Even though a bid of £3m gets your foot in the door, that doesnt mean that you get Sharp for that money. As the rumours go we bid £3.2/3.5m in the Summer. Whether the final bid accepted is the highest price bidded or Sharps decision i dont know. Just what i thought though..
I think it really does mean you get him for that money. Nobody will bid higher than the release clause (except leicester who will bid against themselves). The only variable is personal terms, assuming clubs are willing to meet the figure that triggers the clause.Yep £3m + £3m + £3m = Billy Sharp sold for £10m. Is that right Beddy?
In all seriousness, i meant that if he (the chairman) is making it well known that clubs can bid £3m and talk to Sharp then he may have more interest. Even though a bid of £3m gets your foot in the door, that doesnt mean that you get Sharp for that money. As the rumours go we bid £3.2/3.5m in the Summer. Whether the final bid accepted is the highest price bidded or Sharps decision i dont know. Just what i thought though..
From what I understand (from reading an article in a local Donny paper), this £3 million release clause is only activated next month - hence why we had to bid more back in August (I guess there wouldn't have been much point Donny trying to force us up to £4 or £5 million though, and risk losing our interest, due to knowing full well that they'd only be getting £3 million for him come January).
Every single club who bid £3 million for him next month will get permission to talk to him.
It's not strange. When a player drops a level or goes to a smaller club it's common practice for them to negotiate a release clause at a value that will give the club some profit, but won't price the player out of a move. As the transfer market is always inflating, the fee can often look paltry by the time it is enacted.Ahh ok. So if four clubs bid £3m then it is purely down to Sharp to choose where he wants to go? Seems strange to have a £3m release clause to me, when clubs like Leicester could bid £5m if they want him enough. I guess it doesnt mean that clubs wont offer more, but is it purely down to Sharp once clubs have matched or surpassed the release clause or will agents/Doncaster have a say if one club bids more than another?
I think it really does mean you get him for that money. Nobody will bid higher than the release clause (except leicester who will bid against themselves). The only variable is personal terms, assuming clubs are willing to meet the figure that triggers the clause.
I assume that that release clause was put in by either by Sharps agent or Doncaster, either way it seems like they will loose out if at £3m the choice is solely down to Sharp. Even we would have potentially gone for a bit more than that i think.Ahh ok. So if four clubs bid £3m then it is purely down to Sharp to choose where he wants to go? Seems strange to have a £3m release clause to me, when clubs like Leicester could bid £5m if they want him enough. I guess it doesnt mean that clubs wont offer more, but is it purely down to Sharp once clubs have matched or surpassed the release clause or will agents/Doncaster have a say if one club bids more than another?
Well presumably it was something which either Sharp or his agent requested to be put into his contract when he signed (or last signed a new one), or which Donny offered to put into the contract to entice him to sign (or sign a new one).
Donny wont have a single say in where he goes - although Sharp may well consider their wishes when making a decision, out of respect for them (a bit like say when Adkins made sure that Scunny were appropriately compensated by Cortese for his services). It will all be down to Sharp and his agent - so it's up to us to make sure that he chooses us, over anyone else. Being top of the league, being in a healthy financial position, and being in desperate need of another striker should put us in a strong position to ensure that is the case.
It's a good profit. But in terms of the price that Sharps performances and goals are worth i think that they are loosing out. If we had the same in Lamberts contract, even though we would make £2m profit we would loose out because there is no replacing Lamberts influence for £2/3m.

Saints cons are:[apparently, and yes I know, it's astonishing] location.!?! Sharp doesn't like The South. Other clubs closer proximity to The North and their league position/ambition.