1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Sharing a stadium poll. (re-posted)

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by Q.P.R, Sep 20, 2011.

?

Should we share a stadium.

  1. Yes! we should share a stadium.

  2. No! we shouldn't share a stadium!

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Q.P.R

    Q.P.R Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,320
    Likes Received:
    17
    No seriously what did he mean by 'this'
     
    #21
  2. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    36,051
    Likes Received:
    19,651
    Blimey!! He meant that he agreed with the quote that he put in his reply mate.
     
    #22
  3. Q.P.R

    Q.P.R Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,320
    Likes Received:
    17
    So the word 'this' now means I agree. And I'm suppose to know this how?
     
    #23
  4. FFS.73

    FFS.73 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,799
    Likes Received:
    14
    Commonsense mate. Don't take it personally, this place is merciless. You are burning up lives quick though.....
     
    #24
  5. Q.P.R

    Q.P.R Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,320
    Likes Received:
    17
    Yer, urmm let's get back to answering the poll peoples!. Might even send it to Tony if he does propose sharing a stadium.


    Now where did I leave his address again? Loool
     
    #25
  6. joeyranger

    joeyranger Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    1
    Haha! Just take 'this' to mean 'I agree with the above'....
     
    #26

  7. Q.P.R

    Q.P.R Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,320
    Likes Received:
    17
    Yer lesson learnt. Haha :D
     
    #27
  8. QPR999

    QPR999 Well-Known Member Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    22,135
    Likes Received:
    19,871
    I used to love Loftus Road,

    not any more.

    For the last fifteen years, it was a lovely little ground.

    Get a ticket and a seat wherever you wanted.

    Not any more.

    Unless your a season ticket holder. Unfortunatley, thats not an option,

    for various reasons thats viable for me.

    If i'm fortunate to grab a last minute seat, the view is terrible and being 6'2 , very uncomfortable.

    When I get to an away game, the majority of grounds are far superior than LR.

    We've been left behind in terms of stadium facilities & modernisation. ( I appreciate the building constraints. )

    The only thing i'd miss is the atmosphere, generated by so few.

    So in summarry, If it was down to me, I would build a cauldron of a stadium that maintained this,

    and also gave it a unique look ( A replica of Romes Coliseum maybe. )

    Not a bought off the shelf effort like Coventry or Reading.

    The bottom line is, would I share it?

    NO!
     
    #28
  9. Swords Hoopster

    Swords Hoopster New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    5,942
    Likes Received:
    7
    Not this
     
    #29
  10. Sooperhoop

    Sooperhoop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    35,878
    Likes Received:
    28,371
    I would only consider sharing if there was absolutely no other option. We HAVE to have a new stadium if we are to become an established PL team, Loftus Road for all it's quirky uniqueness is not fit to hold more than 16,000 without there being serious viewing issues and it's bloody uncomfortable, especially if, like me, you suffer from back problems.

    It should be an experience when we play the Mancs to see them try and do the Poznan in our tightly-spaced seating...:grin:
     
    #30
  11. TheLoneRanger

    TheLoneRanger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,890
    Likes Received:
    102
    The bonus of building a new stadium, and one which I hope will just be ours, it can be built to suit our needs now, i.e. the amount of seat, Shape of the stadium, with a roof? and also whether it is to be multipurpose.

    By making it with a Retractable roof and designing it to be multi-purpose, the club could generate a lot of money by letting the stadium out for events and concerts. With Phil Beard being our CEO, I'm sure he could make it the number 1 events venue in West London, or at least give an option to Wembley Arena. This would help pay for the Stadium and generate future income to the club to help make it self sufficient. But also any cost of a new stadium I'm sure would be reduced due to fact that we would probably use steel to build the stadium from Mittal.

    But sharing a new ground will always cause problems and we should own our ground outright, not share it as there will always be disagreements. It would also likely have to look totally neutral to both teams, therefore it wouldn't feel like Rangers stadium.
     
    #31
  12. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    117,463
    Likes Received:
    237,066
    leave Q.P.R. alone you lot..he is making some of my silly questions look sensible
     
    #32
  13. Sooperhoop

    Sooperhoop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    35,878
    Likes Received:
    28,371
    THIS is how it should be done...

    http://www.seagulls.co.uk/page/StadiumGalleryIndex

    The away end is changed for each visiting team to make their supporters feel at home, that could be incorporated into a shared stadium if that was our only option. Compare those pictures with the Loft...
     
    #33
  14. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    117,463
    Likes Received:
    237,066
    we can call it

    the air asia stadium

    have names for each stand

    departure lounge for away support
    arrivals for neutrals
    long stay car park for home support
    frequent flyers for directors box
     
    #34
  15. hammersmith hoopton

    hammersmith hoopton Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,536
    Likes Received:
    10
    It does look the bollocks Sooper!
     
    #35
  16. WBA2_QPR3

    WBA2_QPR3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,796
    Likes Received:
    4,218
    I like Huddersfield's McAlpine Stadium which is a rip off of the Hong Kong Stadium which is a quality design.

    My opposition to moving to identikit stadia is that it destroys the soul of the clubs fanbase, you only have to compare the Emirates now to the old Clock End at Highbury.

    This season the big Prem teams will visit Loftus Road and will feel intimidated by the closed in feeling, the crowd breathing down their necks and the residential streets towering around it. Perfect to turn over Chelsea.

    Be careful what you wish for, not all change is good.

    My mate has close ties to Sheffield Wednesday and sometimes invites me to mid-week matches -

    Me - 'Can you get me a spare ticket?'

    Him - 'I've got 10,0000................'

    If you build it, they might not come
     
    #36
  17. Ninj

    Ninj Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    4,457
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    Kiwi - That's good!!
     
    #37
  18. QPAAAAAGH

    QPAAAAAGH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,795
    Likes Received:
    1,260
    Absolutely spot on Lone. These would have been my thoughts also. I would add one rider which is that if it came to choice of having our own stadium in the arse end of nowhere or having a shared ground that kept us in our current area I would plump for the latter. If the club is going to grow it needs new fans and to attract more of the tourist market. Accessibility is key to that and would not be encouraged by a suburban retail park location.
     
    #38
  19. Northolt-QPR

    Northolt-QPR Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7,806
    Likes Received:
    20
    <laugh>
     
    #39
  20. QPRSAM82

    QPRSAM82 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    791
    Likes Received:
    3
    I have thought about this for ages and although I would prefer not to it makes perfect sense to ground share with either the scum or Foolham. The "West London Stadium" - I can see it now! Costs will be shared if we do it this way and shouldnt end up affecting investment in the team as much so we would be less likely to do a Southampton or even an Arsenal to a different extent.

    The only main problem would be Chelski would want around a 60,000 all seater which they would maybe fill but we wouldnt so the atmosphere wouldnt be as good. So I suggest a 40-45000 all seater ground share with Foolham down the road.

    Either way we need to move out of Loftus road as we cant develop on this site and this would be the cheapest way to do it.
     
    #40

Share This Page