Done for today........ Financial year end so it's quiet. Working all day tomorrow and then off till Tuesday. New financial year will see me busier than you can imagine for a couple of months judging by the diary.
I was pulling your leg because you are prolific on here again now you are not sulking but, in all seriousness, good luck to you & hope it continues
If I had responded as the other party intended I would have walked into an obvious trap that had been set and would have been banned as a result. I know everyone else would miss me, so chose to draw back. At the end of it by taking the path I took and not diving in only one of us was told by a supermod to take any corrective action, namely one of us has a new signature...... Glad to have cleared that up. Now let's never talk of it again....
WRONG - no trap was set up, obvious or otherwise. I don't play your 'fishing'-type games. If you think I set up a trap, then paranoia must be letting you down badly. And you must surely be aware that only you can get you banned. Don't go blaming other people for what you post. You have full control over that. WRONG - you have also previously stated on here categorically that you 'drew back' as you had received an official warning & would be banned if you proceeded. Again wrong - neither of us got an official warning - The Don clearly used the word 'unofficial', but you were somehow blinded to the 'un' part of the word. Perhaps you felt your behaviour merited an official warning? With regards to the signature, I have to say that it still rankles with me that I had to do it. Minxy asked me nicely. She even said she found it amusing, as I did. BRB had told me that my reporting of you could not be investigated until this had taken place. It then fell on our Mods to investigate. I have been asked what action I consider should be taken against you to resolve my complaint. I have resisted the obvious choice of 'ban him', and cannot think of any other suitable sanction to offer. An inflammatory post like yours above should perhaps get me thinking otherwise. Perhaps the troops can think of an alternative solution? Mods - apologies for responding to this, but I could not possibly allow the spin to go unchecked. As I had pointed out before to you, my removal of my signature gives the impression that I was the guilty party, even though it was me making the complaint about his abuse & accusations. He now appears to be trying to capitalise on this, as I predicted to you. I do not believe I am being inflammatory in my response either. It's clear what he's trying to do here.
Whooah!! Please don't do this guys, I only intended a really gentle rib tickler for Chippy simply because I enjoy a bit of banter and I think he does. Can't we just change the name to Sniffer or Mike or something in my post and move on? It really should have never been any more than that!
So now I have paranoia? is that as well or instead of that diagnosis of depression you gave me on the board the other month? Just where do you get off? HTF did you manage to take faux outrage when I fought back with my hearing voices comment when you do this? I disagree, IMO you were goading me into a trap, but at the end of the day you fell on your arse because the thing I objected to (your signature, because it was pure goading hypocrisy) was the as bad if not worse than anything I was doing. It seems my take was agreed with by the world and his wife from what you just posted. 100% certain that if it could have been justified the supermods wouldn't have told you to take it down. Unlike you I don't have the advantage of being close and friendly with the supermods, exchanging messages and generally tittle tattling. I haven't produced a record of how nearly every post I made no matter the content was leapt on by you, and any post vaguely critical of me got a like from you (they are all still there).... even if posts were being made tongue in cheek you are so blinkered by loathing that you don't see it...... Some here did agree with my opinion, you were trying to bully me. The timing of all this was coincidental to Mike getting himself banned. I don't believe in coincidence! But you are right about one thing, only I could get myself banned, and as it stands I am still here. Now ****ing remember it when rewriting history and carrying on your vendetta. Mike and nobody else was responsible for his ban... I suspect the mods will get fed up with your repeated vindictive requests for action to be taken against me for no other reasons than you blame me for something I didn't do, and I disagree with your opinion that Cellino is in any way acceptable as an owner for LUFC. God knows on whose side they would come down on, perhaps they might kick me just to shut you up, or perhaps they might kick you for running a vindictive campaigns with absolutely no foundation for more than two months now... As Elsa sang..... Let it go......let it go.
