Scousers served

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Jan 2, 2012
19,548
3,331
113
Hammersmith
That fact that they were as bad doesn`t make them wrong. All this does is show Jose is no better than anyone on this site that comes out with the excuse "yeah, but what about......."
 
That fact that they were as bad doesn`t make them wrong. All this does is show Jose is no better than anyone on this site that comes out with the excuse "yeah, but what about......."
excuses? he was just defending his players and pointing out that those two were hardly angels in their football days
 
which is defending his current players.

If i am ever in court on a murder charge i would not want him as my lawyer, according to you his best defence argument would be "yes your honour, my client did it, but others have commited murder too so it`s all good" <ok>
 
If i am ever in court on a murder charge i would not want him as my lawyer, according to you his best defence argument would be "yes your honour, my client did it, but others have commited murder too so it`s all good" <ok>
That is called 'Precedent in sentence'! Ofcourse he will make a darn good lawyer and you know it <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
If i am ever in court on a murder charge i would not want him as my lawyer, according to you his best defence argument would be "yes your honour, my client did it, but others have commited murder too so it`s all good" <ok>

The difference here is Mourinho is trying to defend murder by using the precedent of people inflicting paper cuts on others in the past.