Scousers served

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/mar/13/chelsea-jose-mourinho-jamie-carragher-graeme-souness

In particular, Graham got served as chop suey:

"Mr Souness also, but he stopped playing a long time ago. I coached Benfica after he left there so I know a lot about him, so much about him. But I have had a certain kind of education, not just in football but in life, and I prefer to laugh. Envy is the biggest tribute that the shadows do to the man. It’s about life.”

 

nice one jose, stones and glass houses spring to mind

 

Carragher and Souness criticising Chelsea players for being aggressive is laughable. Why do the media pay these toss pots ?

 

That fact that they were as bad doesn`t make them wrong. All this does is show Jose is no better than anyone on this site that comes out with the excuse "yeah, but what about......."

 

excuses? he was just defending his players and pointing out that those two were hardly angels in their football days

 

But he didn`t defend his players, all he did was point out others faults.

 

in doing that he was defending, was he not

 

No, trying to excuse by saying others do/did the same.

 

which is defending his current players.

 

If i am ever in court on a murder charge i would not want him as my lawyer, according to you his best defence argument would be "yes your honour, my client did it, but others have commited murder too so it`s all good"

 

That is called 'Precedent in sentence'! Ofcourse he will make a darn good lawyer and you know it

 

The difference here is Mourinho is trying to defend murder by using the precedent of people inflicting paper cuts on others in the past.