samaras ban?

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

dev why can't you understand the point being made here? Even I know what he means ffs

 

[DevAdvocate]

its a phrase thats obviously been used since but only after McShagger was parading the t-shirt saying "nae dough 2 in a row" because...



reading really isn't your strong point huh?...

rangers (or the fans) have never actually claimed to have "nae dough"


Best dig out your dictionary and look up "Never"

 

[Chapmeister...]

rangers (or the fans) have never actually claimed to have "nae dough"

So chapper is wrong.

Thank you.

fack me, its like we've got paul mcbride picking at the wording here.

so rangers fans were going about for several years saying we've got no money? then got t-shirts made pretending that it was other fans saying such things?

petty petty little man...

 

[DevAdvocate]

dev why can't you understand the point being made here? Even I know what he means ffs

And you would never take the side of someone else against me just because he's a Rangers fan?

Heaven forfend.



He said "NEVER".

 

[DevAdvocate]

fack me, its like we've got paul mcbride picking at the wording here.

so rangers fans were going about for several years saying we've got no money? then got t-shirts made pretending that it was other fans saying such things?

petty petty little man...

Son, you are obviously a moron.

 

[VenomPD]

Son, you are obviously a moron.

No obviously about it. It's definitely, undoubtedly and down-right categorical

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

Son, you are obviously a moron.

oh good one Russ

<beatenman>

 

[DevAdvocate]

Nev, take that tag away, you know which one

 

[Chapmeister...]

rangers (or the fans) have never actually claimed to have "nae dough"


Best dig out your dictionary and look up "Never"

not at all, a little grammatical error on my part (or perhaps childish patter on yours...) where i should have said HAD rather than HAVE...

but yeah, thats the main point of the debate?...

making an absolute c**t of yourself, saaaaaaan

 

[DevAdvocate]

not at all, a little grammatical error on my part (or perhaps childish patter on yours...) where i should have said HAD rather than HAVE...

but yeah, thats the main point of the debate?...

making an absolute c**t of yourself, saaaaaaan

You said "Never"

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

Nev, take that tag away, you know which one

get ****ed.

PS which one?

 

[DevAdvocate]

get ****ed.

PS which one?

Do you really want to do this? Do you want people to find out exactly how you get your kicks? You and your bum chum?

 

[Chapmeister...]

not at all, a little grammatical error on my part (or perhaps childish patter on yours...) where i should have said HAD rather than HAVE...

but yeah, thats the main point of the debate?...

making an absolute c**t of yourself, saaaaaaan

You said "Never"

i know, you're doing it again, did you not read ^^^



when someone's whole arguement revolves around a piece of grammar or spelling then they most definitely are the...

<beatenman>

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

I dont even know what you're on about but I wont be told what to do off of you.

the tag stays. only Ron can make me change it

 

[DevAdvocate]

i know, you're doing it again, did you not read ^^^



when someone's whole arguement revolves around a piece of grammar or spelling then they most definitely are the...

If you say so then you must be right

 

[DevAdvocate]

I dont even know what you're on about but I wont be told what to do off of you.

the tag stays. only Ron can make me change it

So you do know which tag I meant?


So be it, it's been reported

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

So you do know which tag I meant?


So be it, it's been reported

who to? the polis?

 

[DevAdvocate]

who to? the polis?

No that was your pal who threatened to do that.

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

who then? Mick?

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

back on subject please. I believe chapper was dick slapping dev....

continue