samaras ban?

[DevAdvocate]

Dev and Bib are beelin'.

pure Fizzing here

 

[Chapmeister...]

Is this your feeble attempt at appearing to be highbrow?

Your posts so far are unworthy of real comment hence my derision, as I said they are pretty typical of the braindeads who inhabit the forums of which I speak. You language prior to this wholly predictable comeback was all too familiar, similar in content to that of the cloven hoofed ******s of FF and it's ilk.

Read your type before, same ****e, different smell.

well i have no idea what ff is but you appear to be well educated on the matter which is strange if its not your cup of tea?... perhaps you were doing a little "investigating/research" or whatever the excuse was that dear old Pete Townshend gave.

not too sure where your coming from regarding my prior language as i haven't exactly been using slang in my previous posts and i certainly haven't resorted to child-like name editing...

imagine my surprise at your poor attempts to claim some sort of moral high ground whilst claiming to be too busy or not bored enough to reply and yet you still do. I'll also take this opporunity to remind you that you initiated this little exchange you insipid little person.

<waits whilst said buffoon grabs dictionary to look up insipid>

Ok, for starters Pete Townshend was completely exonerated (check and ye shall see) so you have started off badly, no real surprise though, I expected as much based upon your previous nonsense example of said nonsense if you please. and bland regurgitated gibberish. I can plainly see you and the truth are strangers. again, examples please...

where did i mention anything about charges and convictions? you really are a challenge mate.

My own knowledge of FF comes from snippets posted on this forum by other posters (some are even Rangers fans). So no, you are wrong again. Not an auspicious start. Perhaps: Used when one does not wish to be too definite or assertive in the expression of an opinion. I only stated that you were more knowledgable on the subject than I, given that i don't even know what FF stands for i can't see how i was wrong?...

You have not been using "slang"? Is that what you thought I meant when I said you were a "stereotype"? Maybe it's you who needs to dig out that dictionary? No because you didn't refer to "stereotypes" in the above mentioned post, "You language prior to this wholly predictable comeback was all too familiar, similar in content to that of the cloven hoofed ******s of FF and it's ilk." you think its unreasonable to pick out slang from this statement? (i won't even bother with the grammatical errors...) what was that chat about dictionaries?...

As regards "child like name editing", indeed, you are not guilty of that but you certainly do a turn in child like name "calling". from memory i called you insipid, even in this post you can't help it...

Furthermore, I never claimed any "high ground", moral or otherwise, I merely commented that you clearly have a misguided sense of importance and think that by altering your means of expressing yourself (by changing from hokey patter, show me where i have "altered my means of expressing" myself outwith the satirical reply to your initial attempt at humourto what you suppose to be "intelligent" comment) you are something of an iconoclast and are here to shake the foundations of Not606 to it's very core. thats rich coming from you sweetheart...

Thanks for warning me off, i've obviously bitten off more than I can chew with your razor wit.

.

 

[Otto Flayshow]

pure Fizzing here

I knew it.

Have you tried Tees Valley Beef Meatballs yet?

 

[DevAdvocate]

I knew it.

Have you tried Tees Valley Beef Meatballs yet?

No, are they any good?

 

[DevAdvocate]

example of said nonsense if you please.

just slinging back the one your mob were throwing about when lennon won a couple of games against walter...

ps. "bring back the thunder" "i am neil lennon" "we are all neil lennon" pic of the "broony" to sell season books etc, celtic pr department work harder than your centre backs...

what a desperate desperate slavering wreck of a boy...

domestic trophies?!? you on drugs sunshine, one cup, that is all.

1 cup in 3 finals? poor, about as poor as your barrell scrapping justifications as to why your team are better than rangers...

again, examples please...

aaaaaaand out comes the comfort blanket!.... remember you won the big cup tae!...

we might be on our arse but we put your team on their arse last sunday...

evidently several thousand spewing timmies...

is that jelly & ice cream not went mouldy yet? must have been sitting out a while now?

PS, you kids eat all the jelly & ice cream you like, grown ups celebrate with champagne...

There are some examples from this very thread. The likes of which can often be seen on more lowbrow football forums such as “Follow Follow”, a forum which you alone- amongst Rangers fans-have apparently never heard of (unless it was my cunning use of code in the form of “FF”?).

where did i mention anything about charges and convictions? you really are a challenge mate.

Please,point out where I mentioned “Charges” and/or “Convictions”? Let me point out that you implied that Townshend was guilty of something, no? Why mention him then?

perhaps you were doing a little "investigating/research" or whatever the excuse was that dear old Pete Townshend gave.

An “excuse”? Sounds like you know better and are implying that what he said in his defence was an “excuse”?

Perhaps: Used when one does not wish to be too definite or assertive in the expression of an opinion. I only stated that you were more knowledgable on the subject than I, given that i don't even know what FF stands for i can't see how i was wrong?...

I know what “Perhaps” means but you still implied that Townshend was guilty of something.......Perhaps?

No because you didn't refer to "stereotypes" in the above mentioned post, "You language prior to this wholly predictable comeback was all too familiar, similar in content to that of the cloven hoofed ******s of FF and it's ilk." you think its unreasonable to pick out slang from this statement? (i won't even bother with the grammatical errors...) what was that chat about dictionaries?...

Look

We already have plenty of stereotypical OF fans on here, I suppose another one won't do any harm.

I said that you were “Stereotypical” Is that not the same as me calling you a “Stereotype”? Which dictionary ARE you using?

And finally, I don’t think you are really in a position to point out grammatical errors, do you? Honestly? Maybe you should try proofreading back to the start and see how many spelling errors you can spot?

from memory i called you insipid, even in this post you can't help it...

Did I say you called “me” childlike names? Again no, another misplaced assumption on your part, I was talking about your previous words aimed at HarryH. Given that your language there was all I had to go on I leapt to conclusions, correctly as it turns out. (Examples previously given above)

show me where i have "altered my means of expressing" myself outwith the satirical reply to your initial attempt at humour

You are all over the place, one minute talking about “Spewing Timmies” and the next you adopt the tired old routine of responding as if you were David Niven.

thats rich coming from you sweetheart...

Is it?

 

[Rustie bugmuncher]

last season's players in...
Kris Commons £300,000
Anthony Stokes £1.2 million
Emilio Izaguirre £600,000
Beram Kayal £1.2 million
Gary Hooper £2.4 million
Efraín Juárez £3 million
Daryl Murphy £800,000

total, £9.5 million!

plus...
Ki Sung-Yueng £2.1 million
Scott Brown £4.4 million

equals £16 million!!!

Jelavic £3.5 million
Lafferty £3.25 million


your argument is totally flawed. you have at random picked some players celtic bought then chosen to only include two rangers players. but lets not get facts in the way when posting pish on an internet forum

 

[Chapmeister...]

Do you believe that Celtic's squad was more expensive than Rangers? Jelavic and Lafferty alone were more expensive than Celtic's entire team including substitutes in last year's Old Firm games.

last season's players in...
Kris Commons £300,000
Anthony Stokes £1.2 million
Emilio Izaguirre £600,000
Beram Kayal £1.2 million
Gary Hooper £2.4 million
Efraín Juárez £3 million
Daryl Murphy £800,000

total, £9.5 million!

plus...
Ki Sung-Yueng £2.1 million
Scott Brown £4.4 million

equals £16 million!!!

Jelavic £3.5 million
Lafferty £3.25 million


your argument is totally flawed. you have at random picked some players celtic bought then chosen to only include two rangers players. but lets not get facts in the way when posting pish on an internet forum

maybe you should open your eyes before allowing yourself to be overcome with rage...

 

[Chapmeister...]

you really are hard work, i started off thinking you were quite intelligent but as you keep coming back with the same rubbish i'm starting to think otherwise...

example of said nonsense if you please.

just slinging back the one your mob were throwing about when lennon won a couple of games against walter...

ps. "bring back the thunder" "i am neil lennon" "we are all neil lennon" pic of the "broony" to sell season books etc, celtic pr department work harder than your centre backs...

what a desperate desperate slavering wreck of a boy...

domestic trophies?!? you on drugs sunshine, one cup, that is all.

1 cup in 3 finals? poor, about as poor as your barrell scrapping justifications as to why your team are better than rangers...
again, examples please...

aaaaaaand out comes the comfort blanket!.... remember you won the big cup tae!...

we might be on our arse but we put your team on their arse last sunday...

evidently several thousand spewing timmies...

is that jelly & ice cream not went mouldy yet? must have been sitting out a while now?

PS, you kids eat all the jelly & ice cream you like, grown ups celebrate with champagne...


whats nonsensical about that? your mates are giving people so much ammo, i'll explain my rather "low brow" language further down...


There are some examples from this very thread. The likes of which can often be seen on more lowbrow football forums such as “Follow Follow”, a forum which you alone- amongst Rangers fans-have apparently never heard of (unless it was my cunning use of code in the form of “FF”?).

ok so we've established that i don't know what FF is and that i don't frequent specific fans forums, i'm sure you could have picked up on that several posts back! And as explained below, i was replying in a "level" (as you keep referring to with all your high and low brow talk etc, and YOU have the cheek to bring up David Niven too!) which i felt the quoted content merited

Please,point out where I mentioned “Charges” and/or “Convictions”? Let me point out that you implied that Townshend was guilty of something, no? Why mention him then?

Fack me, was he not caught visiting "forbidden website's" my only suggestion was that research may have been your reason for visiting rangers fans forums, was that REALLY so hard to understand?...

An “excuse”? Sounds like you know better and are implying that what he said in his defence was an “excuse”?

again, look above, mountain & mole hill...


I know what “Perhaps” means but you still implied that Townshend was guilty of something.......Perhaps?


again, look above, yawn...

Look

I said that you were “Stereotypical” Is that not the same as me calling you a “Stereotype”? Which dictionary ARE you using?

you may have said that earlier but i was repling directly to your quotes in my post where you reffered to language

***You have not been using "slang"? Is that what you thought I meant when I said you were a "stereotype"? Maybe it's you who needs to dig out that dictionary? No because you didn't refer to "stereotypes" in the above mentioned post, "You language prior to this wholly predictable comeback was all too familiar, similar in content to that of the cloven hoofed ******s of FF and it's ilk." you think its unreasonable to pick out slang from this statement? (i won't even bother with the grammatical errors...) what was that chat about dictionaries?...***

^^^ that still stands...


And finally, I don’t think you are really in a position to point out grammatical errors, do you? Honestly? Maybe you should try proofreading back to the start and see how many spelling errors you can spot?


Did I say you called “me” childlike names? Again no, another misplaced assumption on your part, I was talking about your previous words aimed at HarryH. Given that your language there was all I had to go on I leapt to conclusions, correctly as it turns out. (Examples previously given above)

given what we've just went through above regarding Pete Townshend your accusations of misplaced assumptions should be laughable but at this point are both tiresome and boring.

You are all over the place, one minute talking about “Spewing Timmies” and the next you adopt the tired old routine of responding as if you were David Niven.

spewing timmies etc was limited to one or two posts and that was a tongue in cheek retort to someone who speaks in a simillar fashion over-using words such as "hun" etc...

Your posts so far are unworthy of real comment hence my derision

yeah, looks that way...


i can't even be bothered with you anymore, bored the arse off me and no doubt there will be another long winded reply going over the same points that i've explained several posts ago. and you have the cheek to use words such as regurgitated...

 

[DevAdvocate]

you really are hard work, i started off thinking you were quite intelligent but as you keep coming back with the same rubbish i'm starting to think otherwise... spewing timmies etc was limited to one or two posts and that was a tongue in cheek retort to someone who speaks in a simillar fashion over-using words such as "hun" etc... yeah, looks that way... i can't even be bothered with you anymore, bored the arse off me and no doubt there will be another long winded reply going over the same points that i've explained several posts ago. and you have the cheek to use words such as regurgitated...

Same rubbish?

I simply pointed out where you were talking rot.

 

[Bib Fortuna's Maw]

maybe you should open your eyes before allowing yourself to be overcome with rage...

Maybe you should open your eyes, son.

I said the entire team and quoted the teams on said occasion.

"Losing's losing"

 

[Chapmeister...]

do you believe that celtic's squad was more expensive than rangers? jelavic and lafferty alone were more expensive than celtic's entire team including substitutes in last year's old firm games.do you believe that celtic's squad was more expensive than rangers? Jelavic and lafferty alone were more expensive than celtic's entire team including substitutes in last year's old firm games.

maybe you should open your eyes, son.

I said the entire team and quoted the teams on said occasion.

"losing's losing"

wtf...

 

[DevAdvocate]

Nae dough but 3 in a row.

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

chapper is really getting timmy's knickers in a twist here eh?

 

[DevAdvocate]

chapper is really getting timmy's knickers in a twist here eh?

Sure he is Nev, we are all beeling.

 

[Chapmeister...]

Nae dough but 3 in a row.

rangers (or the fans) have never actually claimed to have "nae dough" and you'll find that the celebratory T-shirts (it was 2 in a row btw, not 3!) were put together in jest towards the other football fans who themselves claimed that rangers had "nae dough".

but i guess you already knew that...

 

[DevAdvocate]

rangers (or the fans) have never actually claimed to have "nae dough" and you'll find that the celebratory T-shirts (it was 2 in a row btw, not 3!) were put together in jest towards the other football fans who themselves claimed that rangers had "nae dough".

but i guess you already knew that...

I'm afraid you are in error again, do you require evidence?

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

keep it up chapper

 

[Chapmeister...]

I'm afraid you are in error again, do you require evidence?

hit me...

<awaits a frantic google bash>

 

[Girvan Loyal 1690]

You must log in or register to see images

 

[DevAdvocate]

hit me...

<awaits a frantic google bash>

I don't need Google, there is ample evidence of Rangers fans using that turn of phrase on this very forum. Use the search facility and look for "nae dough 3 in a row". Plenty of returns.

And thanks to Nev for backing me up with Lafferty's photo above