1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Match Day Thread Saints v Wolves - Wed. 23 Aug @ 19:45 - EFL Cup

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by jonny 'hasen' shuttle, Aug 21, 2017.

  1. Archers Road

    Archers Road Urban Spaceman

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    53,967
    Likes Received:
    58,583
    I wouldn't worry about it mate. I doubt they've heard of you either
     
    #341
  2. Le Tissier's Laces

    Le Tissier's Laces Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    38,877
    Likes Received:
    40,822
    We have a genuine striker. We're just not terribly good at getting him the ball properly.
     
    #342
  3. Schad

    Schad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    17,724
    Likes Received:
    13,007
    Yeah. I mean, we could also get a genuine striker and move Gabbiadini wide, but if we've deployed him there once since joining, I don't remember it.
     
    #343
  4. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    I wouldn't move Gabbiadini wide. He makes all the right runs. We should focus on someone who can find those runs.
     
    #344
  5. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    Don, what's a genuine striker?
     
    #345
  6. Schad

    Schad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    17,724
    Likes Received:
    13,007
    It's mostly that I think he has the intelligence to make those runs from deep, too, and having two players making runs at least would make it harder for our midfielders to miss them (theoretically). As seen with his goal against West Ham, he's damned dangerous with a head of steam, and can finish on the move.
     
    #346
    SouthamptonFCroatia likes this.
  7. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    Maybe, but that example came from down the middle. If he was part of a very flexible front three maybe, but my concern would be that the wide men have to track back more and that means our best goal threat will be further from the goal for large parts of the game.
     
    #347
  8. SAINTDON13

    SAINTDON13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    16,183
    Likes Received:
    2,499
    One that can get a shot on target occasionally and finds the back of the net, or knocks the ball to a team mate that can do the job instead.
     
    #348
  9. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    So you don't think Gabbiadini is one?
     
    #349
  10. SAINTDON13

    SAINTDON13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    16,183
    Likes Received:
    2,499
    Not 100% convinced, I am sure he could be with a decent service, but he can't do it all on his own. He has proved he can score so ample room for discussion here. I would like someone up with him that would make up a strike partnership.
     
    #350

  11. Osvaldorama

    Osvaldorama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    12,334
    Likes Received:
    11,938
    For me, tonight wasn't a striker issue. Charlie Austin literally had NOTHING to feed off.

    We didn't play direct to him, we didn't cross to him, we didn't pass to him. We didn't try and find his runs down the channel. It was embarrassing.

    No, strikers aren't the problem, it's our ponderous midfield. Tonight it was even worse due to being physically outfought down to poor tactics. Normally at least we have a solid foothold before we misplace our passes. Tonight we misplaced our passes and then got caught out of position time and again.
     
    #351
  12. SAINTDON13

    SAINTDON13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    16,183
    Likes Received:
    2,499
    Absolutely, playing sideways, backwards with 2 at the back was bad enough, even worse with three of them doing it! None of the midfield actually created anything as far as I could tell.
     
    #352
    Osvaldorama likes this.
  13. Osvaldorama

    Osvaldorama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    12,334
    Likes Received:
    11,938
    Still gutted. Fingers crossed we put in a big performance at the weekend after that shambles
     
    #353
  14. steve79

    steve79 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,073
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    Im not reading too much into this loss.yeah it was dire.but that was a very experimental lineup and formation,a mistake in hindsight.
     
    #354
  15. St. Luigi Scrosoppi

    St. Luigi Scrosoppi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    11,756
    Likes Received:
    7,984
    It was a low risk game and perfect to try an experimental formation.

    What let us down was the excess of lazy easy passes across the back and an inability to see the runs made by other players.

    We just do not break quickly enough when we regain procession in our own half.

    Contrast our ponderous movement out of defence with Wolves very direct style.

    The evening was no not helped by Tadic's ridiculous diving and a below par performance from JWP.
     
    #355
    thereisonlyoneno7 likes this.
  16. hotbovril

    hotbovril Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,728
    Likes Received:
    1,541
    MP reviews the success of his three at the back formation last night:
     
    #356
    latviandream and shoot_spiderman like this.
  17. garysfc

    garysfc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    4,778
    Likes Received:
    2,877
    Agree. Apart from the very odd aberration, such as Redmond's through ball & goal on Saturday, our support play to Gabbi over the the last few months has been pretty awful. With Puel, the gap was way too much (& pedestrian) and although MP has got us playing more front foot rather than backfoot, we still don't support enough and with sufficient quality. Tadic, JWP, Redmond & Boufal have been frankly awful. Last night, we did the same with Charlie. I know a lot of us have been screaming out for a quality AM; me too but with the above supporting players, you'd think there was enough quality to be able to pick more than just the occasional lock. IMO Davis, is the only one who can really link up the forward play with any real, consistent quality. Anyway, MP, over to you & lets prove our credentials against one of last seasons quality Championship teams, who will definitely be up for it & playing with their FIRST ELEVEN, not like last night!
     
    #357
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2017
  18. garysfc

    garysfc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    4,778
    Likes Received:
    2,877
    100%
     
    #358
  19. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    Your second post is why I think your first post (and earlier comment) is way too harsh.

    If you're sure he could be with decent service, then the player isn't the problem. Gabbi is clearly a quality player.
     
    #359
  20. OddRiverOakWizards

    OddRiverOakWizards Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Messages:
    8,619
    Likes Received:
    2,697
    Let's hope that our poor EFL Cup performance is inversely proportional to our league success: like Koeman & Pochettino, the worse the cup performance the better our league performances!
     
    #360

Share This Page