Fair points. I do agree with your central argument about the new signings needing to adapt quickly to our system and style of play. I’m optimistic for most of them and think generally they’ve improved the team.
It’s a small sample size this season, and some tough fixtures in it, but I’ve been impressed with the defensive reinforcements. Muric has been better than Hdlaky (who can only be second choice at Burnley). Greaves has impressed me and is better than Burgess. O’Shea looks promising, presume he’ll be better than Woolfenden. Arguably one of our best defenders so far has been Tuanzebe at right back, really making that position his own. In midfield, Phillips or Cajuste over Luongo? Jury still out there, although Phillips looked good against Fulham.
I think it’s in attack where we need to see more from our new players - although in the Premier League as a promoted club, I recognise we’re not going to be as potent up top and chances will be rarer. I think Delap leads the line well enough and might be a better finisher than Hirst, but Hirst does have good qualities. When Hirst is back to full fitness, that will be an interesting battle for the starting role. Clarke needs minutes. Szomodics has been alright in an unfamiliar left handed side role. I think Burns still has a place in our team, but I fear his main strength - direct burst of pace to beat his man and put in a cross - is largely nullified by most Premier League left backs.
You see from what I've seen with my own eyes I've yet to see any of the new players so far look considerably better than who they're replacing in terms of performance other than being faster or bigger physically. I'm sure and hope they will be better in time but haven't seen it yet. The only player who'd be kept out is last seasons Tuanzebe for this seasons Tuanzebe. I think Jack Clarke in his fleeting appearances has also looked better than Broadhead.
