Lambert is really good player for us, but is he really the calibre of player that Liverpool will be after?
They spent £35m on Andy Carroll
Lambert is really good player for us, but is he really the calibre of player that Liverpool will be after?
Surprised people are ven debating whether we would sell Lambert, simple fact is becasue he is nearly 31 it would'nt be worth our time to sell him, we would get no where near the value his ability is worth and he is imperative to the way we play. As well as that he is arguably the best striker we have ever had.
Better then Shearer???
Better than Channon?
They spent £35m on Andy Carroll
Surprised people are ven debating whether we would sell Lambert, simple fact is becasue he is nearly 31 it would'nt be worth our time to sell him, we would get no where near the value his ability is worth and he is imperative to the way we play. As well as that he is arguably the best striker we have ever had.
Maybe, it depends on whether you consider football to be more difficult to play now or back then. It also probably depends on the era in which you gre up watching saints, for me Lambert is the best striker we have ever had, just my opinion though.
I would say Channon was far better. Also Ron Davies. Also probably Steve Moran. And I know Terry Paine was more of a winger but him too.
I would say Channon was far better. Also Ron Davies. Also probably Steve Moran. And I know Terry Paine was more of a winger but him too.
i cant imagine you actually watched any of them play though? apart from video tape footage. which it is why it is difficult to make the call on who is best.
I've watched a hell of a lot of that footage. More than enough to know that they were all world class players.
I cant imagine you would have watched enough to deem all of those players better than Lambert.
I cant imagine you would have watched enough to deem all of those players better than Lambert.