I don't disagree that Fibson will go for a legal resolution but, by the same token, I am convinced that the "spying operation" was not "official" Saints policy and this is the result of an intern misconstruing a comment by a more senior member of staff. I cannot believe for one moment any of the directors would have been in favour of this and the coaching staff would be aware of the 72hr rule regarding watching coaching sessions. I get the concern and appreciate exclusion can be seen as a option. I just feel that this will transpire as the actions of an individual misreading a comment by a colleague and thinking he can get away with being clever. If we really wanted to spy they would have sent scout or someone who knows about football.