talkSPORT just said they hope he doesn't come here as "Wanyama is better than Southampton".
How exactly does Talksport think teams can get better if they are not allowed to sign any better players? Idiots.
Great, all we need now is Lawro to say he'll never join Southampton and we are laughing.
To expand a bit on what I said in the other thread, I don't totally agree with TSS but I can see his point. Wanyama looks fantastic but it's a big step up from the SPL. Barry Ferguson, Stilian Petrov and Neil Lennon were all top players up there and average down here (maybe a bit harsh on Petrov, but still). Neil McCann won titles with Rangers but struggled to get into our team at times.
I think Wanyama would probably be a great signing but it's certainly true that playing against tough teams every week in the Premier League is a very different thing to playing out of your skin against Barcelona and then being able to cruise through a couple of games against the likes of Kilmarnock and Ross County before you have to raise your game again.
Have you watched him play in the SPL? I don't mean that disrespectfully, but it's a valid point. The likes of Barry Ferguson and Petrov were impressive against SPL opposition, but you couldn't clearly see they had all the materials to transfer successfully to bigger leagues (as it happens, Ferguson didn't really, but Petrov did and you're being very harsh on him). Wanyama is one of the players who, like Mikel Arteta and Henrik Larsson, are clearly too good for the league and have transferable skills.
EDIT: I should add, this isn't to say he's a surefire success because, well, nobody is, there's a good chance any transfer will bust. I just can't see how he falls under the normal "yeah but SPL is crap" excuse.
It's never a good excuse really. It might be a ****e league, but you can still get a decent idea of how good a player is if you actually pay enough attention.
Petrov is a borderline example. He ended up pretty good but he wasn't at first, it did take a while to adjust, which is why I included him.Have you watched him play in the SPL? I don't mean that disrespectfully, but it's a valid point. The likes of Barry Ferguson and Petrov were impressive against SPL opposition, but you couldn't clearly see they had all the materials to transfer successfully to bigger leagues (as it happens, Ferguson didn't really, but Petrov did and you're being very harsh on him). Wanyama is one of the players who, like Mikel Arteta and Henrik Larsson, are clearly too good for the league and have transferable skills.
EDIT: I should add, this isn't to say he's a surefire success because, well, nobody is, there's a good chance any transfer will bust. I just can't see how he falls under the normal "yeah but SPL is crap" excuse.
Usual blinkered thinking of the so-called experts who pin the usual top 6 in their top 6 places every year and then spend 5 minutes pinning the rest in order of disinterest. This is why I would love to see the so-called glamour clubs relegated for some particularly shocking business misdemeanour. It would knock those smug smiles off knowing pundits faces and restore some proper competition at the same time. There is plenty I dislike about football hierarchy, the Premier League, pundits etc.., but lazy pundits merely suggesting that a club should limit its ambition really grinds my gears. They should be praising a club for its ambition to break the stranglehold of the top 6. This is what makes competition interesting, after all.
We'd have a little Celtic contingent if he joined.
Boruc, Fox, Hooiveld and Wanyama.
Feeder club...![]()
Just flicked on News Now, a lot of websites reporting that a deal is close to completion.