Sadio Mane

[Beef]

OK. I still think you spell reasonably fine, these days, if you'll take that as a compliment.

It is. As I have said before, posting on this forum has helped me with spelling etc.

 

[Qwerty]

You must log in or register to see images

 

[Clem Fandango]

You must log in or register to see images

I'd class him as a striker.

 

[Tintin]

I'd class him as a striker.

He plays on either wing or as a secondary striker. He's a forward.

 

[fran-MLs little camera]

Koeman said in an interview that Senegal may ask Mane to go for assessment...that isn't unusual as it helps avoid clubs pulling a fast one.

 

[Piebacca]

I don't know how anyone could think Ronald Koeman would break the rules.

 

[Dark Lord SFC]

Suspect this is a storm in a tea cup.
Cant blame Senegal wanting an indépendant assessment of Mane just in case something under hand has gone on. Not suggesting Saints would do such a thing but as we all know there are clubs out there that will do anything to keep their players away from internationals

 

[fatletiss]

He plays on either wing or as a secondary striker. He's a forward.

Tomatoe/tomato

 

[Jose Fonte baby]

He's a defender.

 

[ChilcoSaint]

Isn't Sadio our outfield goalkeeper?

 

[benditlikeabanana]

Its now Sadio 'The Wind' Mane .

 

[SaintJabie]

JRod would be my answer, but isn't he still injured.

 

[TheSecondStain]

He plays on either wing or as a secondary striker. He's a forward.

Or an attacking midfielder.

 

[Qwerty]

"Winger" is a position that is very close to not existing any more.

 

[ChrisMarsdenFootballGenius]

Fly half?

 

[saintgreg10]

Problem with this situation is that if Senegal patch Mane up and deem him to be fit enough for the AFCON, chances are when he comes back he could be worse in the long run.

 

[Lff]

I am dyslexic. I don't see the point in people trying to make a joke/ correct peoples use of words (and spelling). This is a football forum not a spelling one. Long as people get what the poster means then it shouldn't matter. Who knows what condition etc the forum user has.

In this case I think you should excuse the correction as it completely changes the meaning of what you said so it was just seeking clarification as far as I could tell. I don't think any malice was intended.