Just wondering if anyone can explain to me why this works the way it does? If ES were to sack Bruce now, my understanding is that he would walk away with a significant, if not complete contract payout. No matter how much I try to understand this I just can't make it make sense.
I, like Bruce, have a job. Also like Bruce, my job security is based purely on my ability to complete my job to an acceptable standard. If I exceed expectations, I get rewarded with a raise. If I do not perform, then I get the sack, and I walk away with nothing.
Can anyone please explain to me why a manager who is not performing well can get sacked yet also pocket enough money to ensure that they probably never need to "work" again?
Apologies if this is a dumb question.....
I, like Bruce, have a job. Also like Bruce, my job security is based purely on my ability to complete my job to an acceptable standard. If I exceed expectations, I get rewarded with a raise. If I do not perform, then I get the sack, and I walk away with nothing.
Can anyone please explain to me why a manager who is not performing well can get sacked yet also pocket enough money to ensure that they probably never need to "work" again?
Apologies if this is a dumb question.....