Roy Munson

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How should we deal with Munse?

  • Have a word.

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • Warning but don't ban.

    Votes: 2 6.5%
  • Temporary ban. A week, perhaps?

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • Longer ban. End of season?

    Votes: 3 9.7%
  • Permanent ban. Virtual beheading.

    Votes: 5 16.1%
  • Do nothing.

    Votes: 19 61.3%

  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .
Ignore works a treat; after CK reminded me of its existence earlier I used it immediately as said poster has bored me senseless and now he has gone.

So I won't vote as I have taken my own action.

I've found the ignore option and have used it.

In a way, the best course of action would be if the entire Spurs board unanimously had him on ignore. He'd swan over here with his GIFs and get absolutely no response from anyone. Eventually he'd give up. Like a hungry dog tied to a lamp post.
 
I've found the ignore option and have used it.

In a way, the best course of action would be if the entire Spurs board unanimously had him on ignore. He'd swan over here with his GIFs and get absolutely no response from anyone. Eventually he'd give up. Like a hungry dog tied to a lamp post.


I've won the vote ! Maybe it's you that we should ban ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego and Dier Hard
I've found the ignore option and have used it.

In a way, the best course of action would be if the entire Spurs board unanimously had him on ignore. He'd swan over here with his GIFs and get absolutely no response from anyone. Eventually he'd give up. Like a hungry dog tied to a lamp post.

If you saw the endless Fosse callouts over a 2-3 year period where he predicted Leicester's downfall, you'll know that he won't give up <laugh>

Just fight him in a GIF battle, he's limited to Vince McMahon, instant advantage to his opponent.
 
So, you lot have came to the same conclusion we on the Toon board have?

He's a ****ing moron and annoying, but he hasn't committed any war crimes and therefore doesn't deserve the death penalty.

Respect.

You survive another one Munson, gratz bro.
 
So, you lot have came to the same conclusion we on the Toon board have?

He's a ****ing moron and annoying, but he hasn't committed any war crimes and therefore doesn't deserve the death penalty.

Respect.

You survive another one Munson, gratz bro.

I was busy when this thread was taking place or I would have pushed for a week ban just for a laff tbh
 
  • Like
Reactions: Munson. and Diego
Voted do nothing - not because I am nice or anything ridiculous like that but because he is not worthy of us taking action. Same reason I don't "ignore" anyone - not even the worst wum we have in the politics section
 
Ignore works a treat; after CK reminded me of its existence earlier I used it immediately as said poster has bored me senseless and now he has gone.

So I won't vote as I have taken my own action.
Tbh I stuck him on my ignore list a couple of weeks ago as he was really starting to get on my tits and that's worked a treat. I'm quite reasonable and the only other one on the naughty step is Sucky and I don't miss his input either!
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Changing Man
There were a number of comments in the Everton match thread about the above poster.
Some appeared to be calling for a ban and others just seemed annoyed.

We're aware that there's a number of people that interact with him regularly on the PL board.
This may be just people having a dig, but I'd like some clarity, so that we know how to react.
I felt that he wasn't crossing any lines, but that may not be the general feeling.
Here's a poll, so we've got a better idea, which we can also apply to anyone else in future.
I'll put a 3 day limit on it.

Can you block a user on a per article bass ??
The GIF posting is boring in the volume done
(the match articles in particular) , so being able to
block them after they have become tedious
would IMHO be more equitable.
 
Can you block a user on a per article bass ??
The GIF posting is boring in the volume done
(the match articles in particular) , so being able to
block them after they have become tedious
would IMHO be more equitable.
Can we (the mods) or can individual posters?
Yes to the former and no to the latter, as far as I'm aware.
 
Can we (the mods) or can individual posters?
Yes to the former and no to the latter, as far as I'm aware.

WUMmery is akin to viruses.
Do too much to the "host" , and you 'breed yourself out' .

So a warning now that if he continues with the tedious
GIF posting volumes, he will be blocked from posting
anything more on that particular article, should suffice.

If not, then repeated behaviour gets the board ban.
 
Can you block a user on a per article bass ??
The GIF posting is boring in the volume done
(the match articles in particular) , so being able to
block them after they have become tedious
would IMHO be more equitable.

If you can then someone needs to ban a certain person (not Munse) from the politics thread where all they do is post tweets
 
If you can then someone needs to ban a certain person (not Munse) from the politics thread where all they do is post tweets
Not the same tweets all the the time though, Maybe similar tweets from various politicians repeating what others have written