Rival Watch
- Thread starter Style
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
See a pattern here?
UEFA 'A' Coaches:
Eng - 1,178
Ger - 5,500
Spain - 12,720
Cost of Course:
Eng - £5,600
Ger - €530
Spain - €1,200
UEFA 'A' Coaches:
Eng - 1,178
Ger - 5,500
Spain - 12,720
Cost of Course:
Eng - £5,600
Ger - €530
Spain - €1,200
Rogers ****s up first game in charge of Scotch Celtic
Lincoln Red Imps win 1 -0 in a CL qualifier.
Lincoln Red Imps win 1 -0 in a CL qualifier.
'Not embarrassing' says Rogers. Of course not, he's used to crap results at Liverpool
Say what you like about the Scousers, but they are indirectly responsible for one of the greatest motoring inventions of our time.
Locking wheel nuts.
Locking wheel nuts.
Leicester's key players (from Schmeichel to Mahrez to Drinkwater) are either moving away or renegotiating their contracts.
Catch 22 for the club: Do they give in to the players demands and put the future of the club at financial risk (especially if they get relegated) or do they sell the players at high cost, pocket the money but then the risk of relegation is even more real as the side is unrecognisable from the premiership winning team?
They can buy medium priced replacements but they risk squandering their money on ineffective players (as the RS have found top their cost most of them have proved to be real crap). Or they can use their prestige as champions to get top players at high fees and high wages. But that means walking a financial tightrope. Leeds anyone?
Do Leicester and their fans accept this is a one off or do they try to capitalise on their good fortune to try to establish themselves amongst the eilte clubs?
Catch 22 for the club: Do they give in to the players demands and put the future of the club at financial risk (especially if they get relegated) or do they sell the players at high cost, pocket the money but then the risk of relegation is even more real as the side is unrecognisable from the premiership winning team?
They can buy medium priced replacements but they risk squandering their money on ineffective players (as the RS have found top their cost most of them have proved to be real crap). Or they can use their prestige as champions to get top players at high fees and high wages. But that means walking a financial tightrope. Leeds anyone?
Do Leicester and their fans accept this is a one off or do they try to capitalise on their good fortune to try to establish themselves amongst the eilte clubs?
Pep working his magic in the PL already - City are worse than last year two-one down to a poor Arsenal
Don't worry, as soon as they sell Benteke and Balotelli they will have enough in the kitty for another zero net spend raid on Southampton.
£40m for Charlie Austin is my bet
