Rival Watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
do you ever not miss the point?

this has nothing to do with history/prestige, it's to do with a man buying a club in it's current state. They attract 5k crowds and their stadium holds something like 15k. They've also just been promoted from a lower division. This wasn't the case with Chelsea.

there are 36k people living on Monaco? how much stadium capacity you want? current one is more than 18k meaning more than 50% of the population of Monaco

meanwhile as a club, the fan base in France is wider spread around the whole france, the culture in france is different than in england, with many supporting local clubs but everyone favor another from big ones which was over the years : PSG, OM and Monaco .. don't comapre england culture in football to France one
so to use the stadium capacity as a reference is a wrong argument

anyway you are missing the bigger picture again .. chelsea fans should never complain about Monaco spending .. you simply have no right .. prior to Abra coming, if you asked anyone to name top 3 clubs in france in past 50 years , you will get monaco .. ask about top3 clubs in england .. no one will name Chelsea even in top10 let alone top3
 
A chav struggling to differ from Monaco.

They differ alright, Monaco have had success and great players before the rich owner arrived and were recognised as a club worldwide, Chelsea were absolute nobodies prior to RA taking over.

What they just wont accept the chavs is that if FFP was about in 2003 they would have missed out on Europe every season with their 800m net debt. But seeing as it is now and wasn't then they are all about 5k crowds. Arseholes

The fact they are trying to look down on Monaco given their own recent decade of history is testament to their ****ing complete and utter stupidity and plasticity.

They just cannot accept Falcao and other good players would choose a nice sunny climate for billionaires and a club with a rich actual earned historic success over a plastic russian knock off of a great club.
 
there are 36k people living on Monaco? how much stadium capacity you want? current one is more than 18k meaning more than 50% of the population of Monaco

meanwhile as a club, the fan base in France is wider spread around the whole france, the culture in france is different than in england, with many supporting local clubs but everyone favor another from big ones which was over the years : PSG, OM and Monaco .. don't comapre england culture in football to France one
so to use the stadium capacity as a reference is a wrong argument

anyway you are missing the bigger picture again .. chelsea fans should never complain about Monaco spending .. you simply have no right .. prior to Abra coming, if you asked anyone to name top 3 clubs in france in past 50 years , you will get monaco .. ask about top3 clubs in england .. no one will name Chelsea even in top10 let alone top3

Exactly, they will clutch straws and say oh but we have more fans, last week it was Oh we are saying this with Irony and now they've given up that pretense<doh>
 
A chav struggling to differ from Monaco.

They differ alright, Monaco have had success and great players before the rich owner arrived and were recognised as a club worldwide, Chelsea were absolute nobodies prior to RA taking over.

What they just wont accept the chavs is that if FFP was about in 2003 they would have missed out on Europe every season with their 800m net debt. But seeing as it is now and wasn't then they are all about 5k crowds. Arseholes

The fact they are trying to look down on Monaco given their own recent decade of history is testament to their ****ing complete and utter stupidity and plasticity.

They just cannot accept Falcao and other good players would choose a nice sunny climate for billionaires and a club with a rich actual earned historic success over a plastic russian knock off of a great club.
never imagined myself saying that .. "but you are absolutely right Sisu "
hhh aside from Chelsea fans, everyone agree 1000000%100 that they were no body before Abra .. i heard they were not even his first choice too <laugh> .. so trying to create a statue to a mid/average club is hilarious and pathetic tbh <laugh>
 
do you ever not miss the point?

this has nothing to do with history/prestige, it's to do with a man buying a club in it's current state. They attract 5k crowds and their stadium holds something like 15k. They've also just been promoted from a lower division. This wasn't the case with Chelsea.

there are 36k people living on Monaco? how much stadium capacity you want? current one is more than 18k meaning more than 50% of the population of Monaco

meanwhile as a club, the fan base in France is wider spread around the whole france, the culture in france is different than in england, with many supporting local clubs but everyone favor another from big ones which was over the years : PSG, OM and Monaco .. don't comapre england culture in football to France one
so to use the stadium capacity as a reference is a wrong argument

anyway you are missing the bigger picture again .. chelsea fans should never complain about Monaco spending .. you simply have no right .. prior to Abra coming, if you asked anyone to name top 3 clubs in france in past 50 years , you will get monaco .. ask about top3 clubs in england .. no one will name Chelsea even in top10 let alone top3

You are STILL missing the point after it being thrust upon you 4 times.

Oh and by the way, I'm not complaining about Monaco, fair ****s to them.

Sisu, follow earlier advice and **** yourself you no mark twat <ok>
 
You are STILL missing the point after it being thrust upon you 4 times.

Oh and by the way, I'm not complaining about Monaco, fair ducks to them.

Sisu, follow earlier advice and **** yourself you no mark twat <ok>
if you are not complaining and know well your actual status, then fair enough <ok>
 
Bearing in mind who Liverpool were bankrolled by in the 70s and 80s I think their fans have a cheek bemoaning anyone else's source of finance. Would it be possible fro camelot to operate a football based lottery and buy an english football club and pump millions into them? Nope I didn't think so either......
 
Bearing in mind who Liverpool were bankrolled by in the 70s and 80s I think their fans have a cheek bemoaning anyone else's source of finance. Would it be possible fro camelot to operate a football based lottery and buy an english football club and pump millions into them? Nope I didn't think so either......

Talk about being stupid, Drogs, you are a tool of epic proportions as a chav, but I am sure you are a decent chap, stop crying over a message board.

As for this fool with the above, Liverpool bankrolled in the 70s and 80<laugh> Man you are thicker than I first thought. 800m chav debt, 800m<yikes> Dwarfs even City's spending, and itd about to go up another 100m.

Only chavsky can spend 50m on a dud and not bat an eyelid. 30m on another dud thats 80m on two dud players, that would put a lot of clubs out of business.
 
Talk about being stupid, you couldn't make it up. Read the posters name before spouting a load of pointless bile you ****ing bell end.
 
Talk about being stupid, Drogs, you are a tool of epic proportions as a chav, but I am sure you are a decent chap, stop crying over a message board.

As for this fool with the above, Liverpool bankrolled in the 70s and 80<laugh> Man you are thicker than I first thought. 800m chav debt, 800m<yikes> Dwarfs even City's spending, and itd about to go up another 100m.

Only chavsky can spend 50m on a dud and not bat an eyelid. 30m on another dud thats 80m on two dud players, that would put a lot of clubs out of business.

Of course they were bankrolled - every club is "bankrolled" by its owner to some degree". I never said they had the money of a Chelsea or a City - of course they didn't but they still had more than anyone else - and all off the backs of the working classes all over the country who bet a few bob to try and get rich <ok>
 
Talk about being stupid, you couldn't make it up. Read the posters name before spouting a load of pointless bile you ****ing bell end.


Mate, just one look at your board says all that you need to know about you lot.

Bile, you have Scouser thread several Man U threads <doh> Plenty of bile at the Bridge too.

plastic little flag waving turds.

As for you NOF, you couldn't argue football if you were paid well to do so, the best you can do is regurgitate stuff you read from the web to offer as a reply after reading a post, that ain't knowledge and you certainly aint got any common sense or class.

So apparently according to the chavs lately.

Fergie retired cos Jose is coming back, even though Fergie quit before Jose came back and the fact he's a 70 year old man who has won everything there is to win and then some without spending billions like Jose.
Also, every manager and his dog turned down managing United apparently.
Monaco are run by a crazy Russian owner and have a small fan base.
The rest of the PL are in fear of Chelsea spending another 150m this summer

Targets for Chelsea this year, win the PL and reach 1bn net debt while they are at it<ok> I wonder how much they've actually spend if you include managers fees and payoffs? Probably over 1bn already if you include that cash.

next week read how Chelsea fans are disgusted by Manchester City's spending <laugh>
 
Mate, just one look at your board says all that you need to know about you lot.

Bile, you have Scouser thread several Man U threads <doh> Plenty of bile at the Bridge too.

plastic little flag waving turds.

As for you NOF, you couldn't argue football if you were paid well to do so, the best you can do is regurgitate stuff you read from the web to offer as a reply after reading a post, that ain't knowledge and you certainly aint got any common sense or class.

So apparently according to the chavs lately.

Fergie retired cos Jose is coming back, even though Fergie quit before Jose came back and the fact he's a 70 year old man who has won everything there is to win and then some without spending billions like Jose.
Also, every manager and his dog turned down managing United apparently.
Monaco are run by a crazy Russian owner and have a small fan base.
The rest of the PL are in fear of Chelsea spending another 150m this summer

Targets for Chelsea this year, win the PL and reach 1bn net debt while they are at it<ok> I wonder how much they've actually spend if you include managers fees and payoffs? Probably over 1bn already if you include that cash.

next week read how Chelsea fans are disgusted by Manchester City's spending <laugh>

Don't 'mate' me you wannabe scouse cretin.
 
Cracking post BBF.

If you fancy a debut trip to Anfield next season I'll happily arrange the tickets for you. Your missus will have to fund the flights and get clearance from the authorities though.

Let me know.