Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Based on just four Chelsky games this season + the dogfight last season,
I would put money on our next visit to the Fridge ending as 11 vs 8. :(
 
The RDBD said:
Michaelreid88
hold on.... What's the difference between @thibautcourtois challenge for @ChelseaFC and @C1audioBravo for @ManCity on @Rooney?

Not awarding it to Man Utd will wind Jose up miles more than it would the Swansea manager ??
Click to expand...

Quite a big difference.

On first viewing it looked like Bravo won the ball fairly, that wasn't the case for Courtois.

But Bravo definitely should have been sent off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee and "Thanks for that Brian"
As oft times before Chelsea have more points than they should have and yet again are in a false position.

Well Sunderland v Everton has some import for Spurs so I'll be eagerly watching it. Never know which JD will turn up though.
 
Citizen Kane said:
In other news, it would seem that you can take the stadium out of West Ham, but you can't take the c***s out of the stadium...
Click to expand...

And a convenient excuse too.
The stewarding resource is provided by the LLDC, for which the Spanners are neither responsible /
nor pay a penny for.

<quote>
Before the game, West Ham co-chairman David Gold tweeted that the club was "trying to achieve harmony" between fans who want to sit and those who wanted "to stand and increase [the stadium's capacity] to 66,000".
</quote>

Should that not be :

Before the game, West Ham co-chairman David Gold tweeted that the club was "trying to achieve harmony" between fans who want
to watch that s*it, and those who wanted 'to not stand for what they are seeing'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D.G.C.
1. Chavs - boo-fecking-hoo! Fecking nerve to complain about refs decisions when they cheat their way to most of them going their way!
2. Spammers - scumbags in the board room and on the terraces. End of.
That's All, Folks!! <cheers>
 
  • Like
Reactions: D.G.C.
Spur of the Moment said:
1. Chavs - boo-fecking-hoo! Fecking nerve to complain about refs decisions when they cheat their way to most of them going their way!
2. Spammers - scumbags in the board room and on the terraces. End of.
That's All, Folks!! <cheers>
Click to expand...
Been like that for years with Chelsea come on.
Still MIGHT back Bilic to put things right though.
 
We've all been laughing about Costa not getting sent off (three times now isn't it, not bad in four games), but actually it's very serious. Not just in terms of goals he's scored later in the match he shouldn't still be in, but appearing and affecting the next game which he shouldn't be in. This is no laughing matter.

Special mention for the fans getting the team they deserve. How the champions one year can struggle to 10th the next tells you all you need to know about the attitude of the players. I don't think we'd tolerate it from our players. Also the ultimate irony is those Chelski fans that took to social media after the Aguero elbow saying they couldn't see how he got away with it at the time, saying that if it was Costa he would have been sent off. NO NO NO, as we know Costa simply doesn't get sent off at all!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back