Not entirely true. Arsenal wouldn't subsidize their fans' away tickets if that was the case.
Is this what you're referring to?
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/arsenal-to-subsidise-travelling-fans
Not entirely true. Arsenal wouldn't subsidize their fans' away tickets if that was the case.
I'm sorry, but Tesco give better discounts then that for return customers. The booking fee is probably higher.
I think it's a bit difficult to criticise them when we charge up to £81 for our category A games.
No British clubs charge as low as £45 for the last 16 of the CL, so no not really.
I find it quite easy mate, when their dearest A game ticket is £123 for a member and £126 for the same seat to a non member. Two thirds of the cost of theirs isn't too bad, no?![]()
£123 and £126 ?? I didn't know that. That is scandalous.
The media ran with a story a few months ago about how the cheapest non-discounted season ticket at Bayern Munich was less expensive than a ticket for a single game at the Emirates.
Not knocking Arsenal specifically for this, as the whole Premier League is appalling for it, but it's a galling illustration of the difference between the two countries.
Well it's getting expensive to watch "the poor man's sport" isn't it? If the fans of 1950 could see the prices today they would all have cardiac arrest.....or pee in their pants!!!!!
It's what happens when you allow neoliberalism to spread to sport. Same thing has happened to the Music and Entertainment industry, completely polarised for the sake of a Buck. Germans restrict corporation involvement of football and keep it pure. The seeds were planted in the late 80s but football truly died a long time ago.
Or monopoly capitalism as epitomised by Chelsea?
Nope, SKY and Man U got the ball rolling. Not sure how that situation was allowed to go on as long as it did.
I'm sorry, but Tesco give better discounts then that for return customers. The booking fee is probably higher.