Rival watch
- Thread starter Spurlock
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
and us HIAG, don't forget that
first time in my life I actually wouldn't mind Spurs winning
What's making me smile, Drogs, is the fact that now you have banned me (as your first act in becoming a Chav mod), you and your lot are now calling for AVB's head, just as I predicted you would
Apparently, speaking the truth is not permitted on your board.
What's making me smile, Drogs, is the fact that now you have banned me (as your first act in becoming a Chav mod), you and your lot are now calling for AVB's head, just as I predicted you would
Apparently, speaking the truth is not permitted on your board.
I didn't ban you HIAG
J
Jayram_Football
Guest
What's making me smile, Drogs, is the fact that now you have banned me (as your first act in becoming a Chav mod), you and your lot are now calling for AVB's head, just as I predicted you would
Apparently, speaking the truth is not permitted on your board.
You were banned as soon as Drogs became a mod?
Nope, that would be undermining the decision of another mod and going against the wishes of the majority of the Chelsea board.
about an hour before I became one.
Jayram; some might call that a just a coincidence
Was that intended to make sense, Ensil/Noah/KK?
Jayram - some might say that HIAG being banned shortly before Mr Moderate replaced SW6 was just a coincidence, however as they are all duplicitous on Fulham's junior club's board I would not be one of them.
They have a great little board now with half a dozen regular contributors. They tend to wander over here to see what a decent forum is like.
They have a great little board now with half a dozen regular contributors. They tend to wander over here to see what a decent forum is like.
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
So what?
That decision - assuming you took no part in it - was a wrong and biased decision, back up with absolutely no evidence than your own pathetic bias. To reverse it would not only be righting a wrong, but would prove that you had balls.
A little too convenient, I think
I'd assume that whoever asked for Drogs to be made a mod also asked for HIAG to be banned in the same PM.
Coming from the guy who logs off to view the Chelsea forum.So what?
That decision - assuming you took no part in it - was a wrong and biased decision, back up with absolutely no evidence than your own pathetic bias. To reverse it would not only be righting a wrong, but would prove that you had balls.
A little too convenient, I think
I agree with the banning of you. I see nothing wrong with it as you are a complete troll looking to gain reaction from everything you post about other clubs.
In all seriousness, I didn't ban you/sanction a ban for you and it's totally up to you if you believe I did.
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
Drogs, everything I said on your board (and which pathetic wumsters such as DL, Cooper and Chelsea - 100 years of nothing, took such offence to), is coming true! FFS! even you and those wumsters are agreeing with me that you need to get shot of AVB before he does any more damage.
Of course you've got to make out that my banning was correct (despite your having, in the past, admitted to me in PMs that you don't consider me to be a wum), because to do otherwise would put you in direct opposition with the twats on your board, who practically constitute the entirety of your fan-base on this forum; and you simply are not big enough or brave enough to take a lone stance for justice. It takes true courage to stand up and tell others that they are wrong.
I don't agree with your stance, but I can understand what motivates you. I cannot blame you for being weak, that's just how it is.
Of course you've got to make out that my banning was correct (despite your having, in the past, admitted to me in PMs that you don't consider me to be a wum), because to do otherwise would put you in direct opposition with the twats on your board, who practically constitute the entirety of your fan-base on this forum; and you simply are not big enough or brave enough to take a lone stance for justice. It takes true courage to stand up and tell others that they are wrong.
I don't agree with your stance, but I can understand what motivates you. I cannot blame you for being weak, that's just how it is.
My neutered male dog has more balls than Mr Moderate, however we shouldn't mock as cryptorchidism can lead to cancer and psychological problems .... further proof of HIAG's allegation has some foundation perhaps
Why does it matter that it's coming true? So if I create a thread on here stating you'll slip down to 5th when Harry leaves and it comes true does that mean I'm not winding you up? Come off it mate.
I had PM'd you in the past but that was a long time before you were warned and you said you were having a bit of banter which I fully understood, but you then took it too far and SW6 and Ginge agreed to ban you after recieving many complaints.
Bottom line is that you wound a lot of us up despite being told to stop, doesn't matter if YOU think it's right or not, you respect the rules of a board.
I have told you before that it isn't necessary to log off to read Fulham's junior club's board - I am sure that as a moderate you can confirm how often I log on and log off. As a point of interest I am looking at it now;
My neutered male dog has more balls than Mr Moderate, however we shouldn't mock as cryptorchidism can lead to cancer and psychological problems .... further proof of HIAG's allegation has some foundation perhaps
Sick
although, more proof of your contradictive personality.
That's two grammar mistakes now, pedant, you feeling ok today?
Anyway, that doesn't matter as you still make the effort to come on our board.
So what?
That decision - assuming you took no part in it - was a wrong and biased decision, back up with absolutely no evidence than your own pathetic bias. To reverse it would not only be righting a wrong, but would prove that you had balls.
A little too convenient, I think
Let it go HIAG.