Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
goons; played 24 - goals for 46 - goals against 34 = + 12
Spurs; played 23 - goals for 44 - goals against 25 = + 19

goons; goals scored per game - 1.91
Spurs; goals scored per game - 1.91

goons; goals conceded per game - 1.41
Spurs; goals conceded per game - 1.08

Goons; average goal difference per game - 0.50
Spurs; average goal difference per game - 0.82

0.81 > 0.62

Yup - I'm really worried about the goons bettering our goal difference <doh>

Good stats <applause>
 
goons; played 24 - goals for 46 - goals against 34 = + 12
Spurs; played 23 - goals for 44 - goals against 25 = + 19

goons; goals scored per game - 1.91
Spurs; goals scored per game - 1.91

goons; goals conceded per game - 1.41
Spurs; goals conceded per game - 1.08

Goons; average goal difference per game - 1.50
Spurs; average goal difference per game - 1.82

1.82 > 1.50

Yup - I'm really worried about the goons bettering our goal difference <doh>

I find this post disappointing, when I've taken time to explain the situation.
 
your turn GH <laugh>


You knew I wasn't going to like that didn't you DM.

I'm really sorry Ensil has taken this tack with me, as I was one of the people who was getting on best with him.

It's up to him, if he wants to maintain his <doh> stance to my carefully reasoned and accurate post, then fine, there will be no point debating with him any more.
 
I'm not having a pop - honest; just presenting the facts as I see them.

I do, however, get a little aggrieved when unjustified negativity is brought to the board and though I agree that we shouldn't go over the top with our optimism I also believe that pessimism is something we could do without, realism yes, pessimism no.

As a point of interest of RVP has scored 22 of the goons 46 goals - what would happen to them should he get injured?
 
I'm not having a pop - honest; just presenting the facts as I see them.

I do, however, get a little aggrieved when unjustified negativity is brought to the board and though I agree that we shouldn't go over the top with our optimism I also believe that pessimism is a negativity we could do without.

As a point of interest of RVP has scored 22 of the goons 46 goals - what would happen to them should he get injured?

Well you've got a choice KK. You either remove the <doh>, and accept that my argument is justified, which it is, or you explain what is wrong with my analysis, or I can't on principle debate with you any more.

I'm very disappointed you chose to dismiss my accurate and reasoned post in such a dismissive way.

My point is completely valid. Of course, if RVP is injured, the chances are increased they won't catch us.

The point I am making, CORRECTLY, is that if they do catch us on points then they will almost certainly overtake us on GD, and the +6 they've run up today, has caused that shift in the analysis.

Had they won by one or two, we'd still be in the comfort zone re GD.
 
You knew I wasn't going to like that didn't you DM.

I'm really sorry Ensil has taken this tack with me, as I was one of the people who was getting on best with him.

It's up to him, if he wants to maintain his <doh> stance to my carefully reasoned and accurate post, then fine, there will be no point debating with him any more.

I wouldn't worry about it mate. Anyone who's anyone on here has got at least one <doh> from him.
 
I wouldn't worry about it mate. Anyone who's anyone on here has got at least one <doh> from him.

:) KH. I'm not worried, just a little sad, that a person I've got on well with, has turned against me like that.

If I'd have been rude to him, or whatever I could understand. I've just pointed out the maths of the situation, and for some reason, he's got annoyed at me.
 
The point I am making, CORRECTLY, is that if they do catch us on points then they will almost certainly overtake us on GD, and the +6 they've run up today, has caused that shift in the analysis.

But it isn't correct as I have demonstrated - our goal difference per game is superior to that of the goons so if we continue as we have, and the goons do the same, the difference between the differences will get even bigger. Let's not carried away by their win against Blackburn as their result today did no more than offset their heavy defeat by Manure, as did our 4-0 demolition of Liverpoor offset our result against Mancheater Pity.

They are so reliant on RVP that they would collapse without him - we on the other hand have 2 joint top scorers on just 9 goals apiece. With Spurs goals can come from anyone and anywhere - with the goons almost 50% come from one player.

As for arguing with you I truly am sorry but I really can't be bothered, arguing with people is what goons, chavs and scousers are for.
 
You both make good points, nothing wrong with disagreeing with each other and it's a shame Ensil/Noah/KK can't accept that as it would save him many an argument and then it would leave him free to discuss Spurs and football.
 
You both make good points, nothing wrong with disagreeing with each other and it's a shame Ensil/Noah/KK can't accept that as it would save him many an argument and then it would leave him free to discuss Spurs and football.

Which is ALL that I am doing, however I am substantiating my comment with unequivocal facts and NOT what if scenarios.

I have asked you before about desisting with the Ensil/Noah/KK reference, it isn't clever or funny and if the powers that be that run this site took the trouble to respond to the many requests for an explanation as to what happened to my original account it could all be put to bed once and for all. So I shall ask again; please only refer to me using the account name that appears when I post.
 
Which is ALL that I am doing, however I am substantiating my comment with unequivocal facts and NOT what if scenarios.

I have asked you before about desisting with the Ensil/Noah/KK reference, it isn't clever or funny and if the powers that be that run this site took the trouble to respond to the many requests for an explanation as to what happened to my original account it could all be put to bed once and for all. So I shall ask again; please only refer to me using the account name that appears when I post.

There is a way to disagree with people without belittling them or being rude, if you did that then you wouldn't have half as many issues with people.

I refer to you as Ensil/Noah/KK so any newcomers know that you are one and the same person <ok>
 
I refer to you as Ensil/Noah/KK so any newcomers know that you are one and the same person <ok>

In which case you are misrepresenting the facts. As you are unable to substantiate that statement with and evidence it is no more than an opinion. That I was Ensiluokkainen is common knowledge, that you think I was also Noah is, quite frankly, a joke and insulting, unless you can prove otherwise I again request that you cease the reference.
 
In which case you are misrepresenting the facts. As you are unable to substantiate that statement with and evidence it is no more than an opinion. That I was Ensiluokkainen is common knowledge, that you think I was also Noah is, quite frankly, a joke and insulting, unless you can prove otherwise I again request that you cease the reference.

Why is it a joke and insulting? I wouldn't be insulted if someone mistook me for my 'son'

I'm not alone in thinking you are Noah.
 
Why is it a joke and insulting? I wouldn't be insulted if someone mistook me for my 'son'

I'm not alone in thinking you are Noah.

And there lies the rub - thinking isn't knowing.is insulting because you are calling me a liar - doing so is an insult to me and my integrity, it is a joke because your comments are based upon your "thoughts" rather than knowledge and as such are they are truly laughable.

If you are able to prove what you "think" I challenge you to lay down that proof - if not I again request that you desist making your libellous, laughable and insulting comments.