Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I am on another planet. Or that's what I'm told. Although it might be the voices in my head telling me that.
 
I thought Lee Dixon played for Chester City not Man City , he is blowing smoke so far up their arses that it's coming out their ears
 
Alfie Conn said:
I thought Lee Dixon played for Chester City not Man City , he is blowing smoke so far up their arses that it's coming out their ears
Click to expand...

Keep reading reports of Pep's super subs. Because you know it's only possible to praise him. It most certainly doesn't work the other way. I mean through all that horrendous run of results he must have made loads of substitutions. Which clearly didn't work. So "Pep's subs fail again" would be at least as justified a headline for that, which we can file under headlines we are never going to read about the bestest ever manager.
 
vimhawk said:
Keep reading reports of Pep's super subs. Because you know it's only possible to praise him. It most certainly doesn't work the other way. I mean through all that horrendous run of results he must have made loads of substitutions. Which clearly didn't work. So "Pep's subs fail again" would be at least as justified a headline for that, which we can file under headlines we are never going to read about the bestest ever manager.
Click to expand...
So bitter <laugh>

Are you a scouser?
 
vimhawk said:
Keep reading reports of Pep's super subs. Because you know it's only possible to praise him. It most certainly doesn't work the other way. I mean through all that horrendous run of results he must have made loads of substitutions. Which clearly didn't work. So "Pep's subs fail again" would be at least as justified a headline for that, which we can file under headlines we are never going to read about the bestest ever manager.
Click to expand...
Subs work about half the time I think. Should actually be less than that if the best eleven players started. I don't think any manager has an edge on subs.
 
vimhawk said:
Keep reading reports of Pep's super subs. Because you know it's only possible to praise him. It most certainly doesn't work the other way. I mean through all that horrendous run of results he must have made loads of substitutions. Which clearly didn't work. So "Pep's subs fail again" would be at least as justified a headline for that, which we can file under headlines we are never going to read about the bestest ever manager.
Click to expand...
The thing about super subs is people mainly notice them if they score, for example Pavlyuchenko's scoring run off the bench for us, or at a push if they get the assist for a winner

On the other hand, does anyone notice if someone is subbed on and they shut down midfield for the rest of the game or make a game-saving challenge in stoppage time?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back