well 2 things
1. everyone should have been behind Klopp on the absolute **** show of Var that day which has never been completely explained
2.How have Liverpool benefited from Var since compared to other teams
My gripe with the coverage is that it simply ain't consistent.
Here's a few examples:
1.The VAR fiasco that benefited Liverpool against Wolves in the FA Cup did not lead to outrage. Klopp wasn't campaigning then (don't blame him personally) so the "everyone should get behind klopp" argument is weak IMHO.
3. VAR wasn't working in the first 5 minutes of the Spurs Villa match v villa. A defender elbowed Gil in the head. A clear red and penalty. But as VAR wasn't working nothing happened. Apparently VAR couldn't get in touch with the ref.
No fuss was made about it in the media even though it was a game changing incident.
No questions were asked about why the game was started without VAR working when it was known before kick off.
You must log in or register to see media
No one outside of spurs fans know about this cos no fuss has been made in the media.
The Liverpool mistake was farcical and unacceptable but there is a massive discrepancy in how much media coverage is given.
Rafa Benitez said similar about united in his infamous fact rant.
The truth is VAR ****ed up ... genuinely don't understand what more needs to be explained tbh...the puppet in the VAR office thought that the on field decision was given as a goal and said go with on field decision instead of "not offside give a goal to Liverpool " no chance of any **** up with that.