Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It appears Liverpool didn't score in the first half against Everton. This means they only have 45 minutes to do so. Oh, hang on a minute, what am I thinking! They have an unlimited amount of time to score.
 
  • Like
Reactions: littleDinosaurLuke
It seems Liverpool only got a modest six minutes of extra time (which is probably longer than average). Might even have been less if they'd scored during the six minutes.
 
KingHotspur said:
Chelsea got a dodgy var decision to hold on to a 2-1 win
Click to expand...

Dodgy doesn't even get near the travesty that was that decision. Hammers robbed if it wasn't Chelsea that benefitted it would be funny.

But in all seriousness its one of those decisions that really makes you question how much corruption there is in the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crackerman jack and Left on the Shelf
KingHotspur said:
Chelsea got a dodgy var decision to hold on to a 2-1 win
Click to expand...
You must log in or register to see media

Should've been off against us and should be off for that, too.
Are they intentionally ****ing up on VAR all the time to get rid of it?
 
Not every team can go to Holte HQ and win 4-0.
Never mind, who do Citeh play next in the PL ...

You must log in or register to see media
 
Last edited:
It’s all good scoring hat tricks in 6-0 wins

A great striker scores winners in tight affairs like our boy Kane did

City with Haaland won’t be running with it as predicyedn
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back