Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
This is similar to the FA Cup semi final between the two, Chelsea seem to have their number.

City really needed to score the first goal, now they’re a goal down I wouldn’t be surprised if Chelsea go on to win it, probably even bag another on the counter.
 
Proper rock and a hard place match - hate City - despise Chelsea lets be honest it is just a cheque book battle, best result would be an abandoned match due to a mass brawl with 5 sent off from both sides.
 
Seeing Chelsea win hurt more than I thought. God, I hate this sport so much sometimes.

**** sake.

The first time hurt us so much more, lol.

But this one’s still crap. I’d have been a bit “meh” about it if we weren’t so bloody awful ourselves but them winning just compounds our misery really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee
Two medium sized and financially doped to the hilt clubs they may be, but their owners have ambition to win silverware at the expense of profit. The clubs that win the trophies 95% of the time, identify weaknesses in their squads and go out and get the players to fix it with little fuss, and the results are there for all to see. Unfortunately for Spurs, we are the complete opposite and have skinflint owners by comparison, we will have a long wait for some silverware under the current unambitious and incompetent regime.
 
Seeing Chelsea win hurt more than I thought. God, I hate this sport so much sometimes.

**** sake.
To be blunt I had the feeling they were going to wind up winning it, especially after all the fairytale Narratives of Aguero winning the CL in his last game (unless you're Sky, who insist his last game was last weekend...) as if all they had to do was turn up
 
Two medium sized and financially doped to the hilt clubs they may be, but their owners have ambition to win silverware at the expense of profit. The clubs that win the trophies 95% of the time, identify weaknesses in their squads and go out and get the players to fix it with little fuss, and the results are there for all to see. Unfortunately for Spurs, we are the complete opposite and have skinflint owners by comparison, we will have a long wait for some silverware under the current unambitious and incompetent regime.
Two clubs where my values would not permit me to be a season ticket holder. Chelsea is a money laundering operation for a known criminal. Man City is effectively owned by a foreign state.
 
Two medium sized and financially doped to the hilt clubs they may be, but their owners have ambition to win silverware at the expense of profit. The clubs that win the trophies 95% of the time, identify weaknesses in their squads and go out and get the players to fix it with little fuss, and the results are there for all to see. Unfortunately for Spurs, we are the complete opposite and have skinflint owners by comparison, we will have a long wait for some silverware under the current unambitious and incompetent regime.

Rubbish. There is no way that any normal owner could compete with that. You can't complain about their "business model" (which of course is nothing like any sort of business we know of) and then want the same for our club. Those two clubs should not exist in their current form, and all the trophies they've 'acquired' since it happened have been bought and are tainted (regardless of what the pundits say). To compare any other owners to that is meaningless and unfair. Ambition is all very well but there's a financial ceiling- for most 'normal' clubs. You may want us to be like them but I don't. And you can't have it both ways. And how much have Citeh spent anyway and they still haven't won the CL.