Watching the Pool match again, I agree that the "pen" may not have been clear cut - although I happen to think it was. Nevertheless it occurs to me that what Pool have really been benefiting from is not straight "wrong" decisions, but those where there is any element of doubt - in other words where the ref has a subjective decision to make. This is far more subtle than straight right or wrong, but it's probably where the refs have the most influence. Sure that penalty we should have had against them was pretty clear cut, but since then there's been quite a number of less clear incidents.
They don't get criticism because the pundits just say stuff like "well you can see why the ref gave it / ref didn't give it". The trouble is that their opinion changes according to which team is getting the decision. So if the decision could go ether way, then half the time (or at least some of it), the decisions would go against Liverpool. The difficulty is that so far this season the decision never seems to go against Liverpool. And I'm left with the feeling that we've earned our 3rd place, but Liverpool have been given 2nd.
Around 80% of referees will always give Pool the benefit of doubt on the key 50/50 decisions, which makes a massive difference in any game We all know that had it been a Liverpool player fouled on Saturday, then a penalty would have been given.
Then you have the dodgy German officials in the CL looking after their countryman also.
. How strong a team will Poch field on Wednesday? And do you think (potential) fatigue from this game would affect you in the NLD on Sunday? Baring in mind that we will (if Emery has any common sense whatsoever) rest all our first team players and field the youngsters/fringe players in Ukraine on Thursday.
You're facing absolute dross up until the quarter final stages. Although I suppose we have a better chance of winning it than most, so beggars can't be choosers. And I guess it's an opportunity to blood some of the youth prospects.