Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Chelsea and West Ham have been fined for their handbags the other day:

Quite pointless and I expect they'll both be up to it again pretty soon.
Wouldn't surprise me if they kick off against the filth on the weekend, for a start.
 
Juve looked like they might get it back but very harsh red card so looks like we’ll have atletico or galatasaray although could easily be more reds in this game
 
Juve looked like they might get it back but very harsh red card so looks like we’ll have atletico or galatasaray although could easily be more reds in this game

I don't think we have the tools to get through a Simone team.

Gala can be got at. Watched the game and was unsurprised so see that Sanchez still resembles Bambi on ice at times.

The worry is the likes of Osimhen, Yilmaz and Same taking on our clown car back line.
 
Juve looked like they might get it back but very harsh red card so looks like we’ll have atletico or galatasaray although could easily be more reds in this game
That red was a complete joke! How can it even be a foul? He jumped up for a ball, headed it and then landed on the guy who didn't bother to jump!
Giving a yellow was ridiculous but to then change to a red was madness - and totally unnecessary as he was off already?
 
That red was a complete joke! How can it even be a foul? He jumped up for a ball, headed it and then landed on the guy who didn't bother to jump!
Giving a yellow was ridiculous but to then change to a red was madness - and totally unnecessary as he was off already?

Increasingly we're seeing officials make their judgement based on outcome instead of input.

Exactly the case when Brennan was sent off in this competition.

This is the problem with VAR and video technology. Anything slowed down in HD from multiple angles will look 100x worse than it actually was.

Context and intent are all that should matter in making a decision, but that is rarely the case. Instead we now have the equivalent of looking at a car crash and saying *because* the bonnet is crumpled, it *must* be the other driver's fault and we *must* ban them. Meanwhile ignoring the black ice all over the road.

I felt the same about that last minute penalty in the Dortmund game. Ref seemed fine with it until the cameras cut to the striker with blood running down his head because he, half the size of the defender, stooped to head the ball at the same time that the defender went to kick it, and the replay showed clearly that the defender made contact with the ball and wasn't looking at the striker. But outcome of blood = assumption of foul play.
 
Increasingly we're seeing officials make their judgement based on outcome instead of input.

Exactly the case when Brennan was sent off in this competition.

This is the problem with VAR and video technology. Anything slowed down in HD from multiple angles will look 100x worse than it actually was.

Context and intent are all that should matter in making a decision, but that is rarely the case. Instead we now have the equivalent of looking at a car crash and saying *because* the bonnet is crumpled, it *must* be the other driver's fault and we *must* ban them. Meanwhile ignoring the black ice all over the road.

I felt the same about that last minute penalty in the Dortmund game. Ref seemed fine with it until the cameras cut to the striker with blood running down his head because he, half the size of the defender, stooped to head the ball at the same time that the defender went to kick it, and the replay showed clearly that the defender made contact with the ball and wasn't looking at the striker. But outcome of blood = assumption of foul play.
I agree with your sentiments but the Laws don't.
"Using excessive force is when a player exceeds the necessary use of force and/or endangers the safety of an opponent and must be sent off" and "A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play."
There is no mention of intent. Kicking someone in the head obviously endangers their safety as does landing on their leg after jumping so both are red cards.
 
Increasingly we're seeing officials make their judgement based on outcome instead of input.

Exactly the case when Brennan was sent off in this competition.

This is the problem with VAR and video technology. Anything slowed down in HD from multiple angles will look 100x worse than it actually was.

Context and intent are all that should matter in making a decision, but that is rarely the case. Instead we now have the equivalent of looking at a car crash and saying *because* the bonnet is crumpled, it *must* be the other driver's fault and we *must* ban them. Meanwhile ignoring the black ice all over the road.

I felt the same about that last minute penalty in the Dortmund game. Ref seemed fine with it until the cameras cut to the striker with blood running down his head because he, half the size of the defender, stooped to head the ball at the same time that the defender went to kick it, and the replay showed clearly that the defender made contact with the ball and wasn't looking at the striker. But outcome of blood = assumption of foul play.
Waiting for the refcam of that...