Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I was thinking that it was good that the ref was letting contact happen during the game, then he makes a decision like that
 
Now the ref has changed his tolerance levels and blowing for everything and in the process ruining the game
 
What did Muniz do wrong? He turned away from Chalobah quickly. Chalobah was attempting to challenge him, which is why there was contact.
It is actually a decision that you could almost understand had the ref given it immediately - reacting to the Chelsea players theatrics. But to review in detail for 2 minutes and then give it is inexcusable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurf
Var should stick to goal line decisions and maybe offsides
They need more competent refs. How anyone looking at that thinks it was a foul is beyond me. It hasn't a clear error so the VAR is wrong to intervene but the referee should just have ignored him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockspur
They need more competent refs. How anyone looking at that thinks it was a foul is beyond me. It hasn't a clear error so the VAR is wrong to intervene but the referee should just have ignored him.
Competent or just empowered?
For me it is both.
And in that case, no former player would have given that as a foul, so why not have that expertise available to VAR, rather than just have a 2nd rate ref and slow motion?
 
They need more competent refs. How anyone looking at that thinks it was a foul is beyond me. It hasn't a clear error so the VAR is wrong to intervene but the referee should just have ignored him.
VAR is disputing the refs decision putting them under pressure to change it.