Listening to the radio out on a walk Friday evening I was listening to what seems to be the umpteenth discussion of why ManU aren't very good at the moment, often mentioning that they were second last season. This has been done on TalkShite so many times, but then I realised I was listening to R5Live, so they are at it too.
My main point was there is all this deep analysis of all sorts of factors. Yet for all these pundits in all these discussions I haven't heard one of them say something that seems to me to be rather obvious. That obvious thing is that if you add a lot of penalties to a team in 6th-ish place, they are very likely to get top 4 and may even get second. So my question would be, how much different are ManU this season than last, other than not having anywhere near as many penalties? Of course it's more complex than that, but it's equally true that penalties are clearly a factor - so why does nobody mention this?
Incidentally something else that one of the experts (I think it was a journalist rather than an ex player) said in relation to Fraudiola being a great manager, was that he got to grips with Citeh quickly after he took over. Really? Are we rewriting history? As far as I remember Fraudiola didn't do very well in his first season, but he "recognised the weaknesses" and addressed them. Which is of course code for saying he threw a huge amount of money at the problem. I've said it before but many managers can recognise a problem, but very few can simply spend their way out of it.