There has been pretty much non-stop ManU on TalkShite and similar since Olly's departure. IMHO the balance of opinion is that Rangnick is so influential as he invented the game that the German managers play etc, so he's clearly a good appointment. But then again pundits do tend to have similar opinions don't they? Yet in all this discussion, you would think someone might have said (of course I could have missed it) something to the effect that if he's so good, why was he working at Lokomotiv Moscow? If he's that good, why didn't a top club pick him up? Now he may well be successful, but look at the players he's got to work with.