Rival watch
- Thread starter Spurlock
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
He should be. Losing to Arsenal, FFS. Useless ****er. Even if they did cheat to steal a penalty.
Don't take the piss, he's needed some comfort eating recently.
Us ! If we are to play in this negative way then lets get the master of it to go full Spurs-Stoke. We can hack our way to a plastic reindeer cup.
We’re not the only team who does what they can to try and gain an advantage in the penalty area it seems:
You must log in or register to see media
Not even a booking!
It's a push and he falls over. Not a penalty, but not a dive.
We didn't get the decision either, despite it being the same official for the VAR on your one, which was clearly a blatant dive:
You must log in or register to see media
Lee Dixon and Ian Wright are clearly biased against Arsenal. Tierney was right to give the decision to... Tierney...
Are you kidding me? Of course he dived!
Look at the way he goes to ground, it doesn't look natural at all. There's no 'push', there's barely any contact if any at all. It isn't the first time Kane has dived and it certainly won't be the last. I personally think the penalty we got was extremely soft, but there was more contact on Tierney from Reece-James than Saiss on Kane.
You must log in or register to see images
You naming people who thought it wasn't a penalty means nothing, by the way. Shearer thought it was a penalty, and I saw two different sets of Chelsea fancams on YouTube say it was a penalty, too. It wasn't a 'clear and obvious' decision to overturn if people can't agree on it.
I completely agree mate ... am genuinely pleased that I can not go to games atm cos if truth be told I would be telling my girls I'd rather stay home and watch Eastenders than spend £150 on taking the 3 of us to a game.
Either way, we are gonna be bored ****less and wondering why we bothered ...but at least I'd be £150 better off!
****, I ain’t hating the football that much.
Are you kidding me? Of course he dived!
I personally think the penalty we got was extremely soft, but there was more contact on Tierney from Reece-James than Saiss on Kane.
You must log in or register to see images
You naming people who thought it wasn't a penalty means nothing, by the way. Shearer thought it was a penalty, and I saw two different sets of Chelsea fancams on YouTube say it was a penalty, too. It wasn't a 'clear and obvious' decision to overturn if people can't agree on it.
There's far more contact on Kane than there is on Tierney and what little there is on the Arsenal man is from his own actions.He Piresed it. Goes to ground and sticks his leg back to make contact with the defender.
Anyone that thinks that's a foul should stop watching football altogether, as they have no idea what they're watching.
It was a blatant dive and it should've been overturned. It wasn't because Tierney is ****ing useless and he gave it to his namesake.
The Premier League should ban him in the same way that they did Niasse for Everton, but they won't.
Cavani should've been banned for this last week, but they're not fit for purpose:
You must log in or register to see media
He Piresed it. Goes to ground and sticks his leg back to make contact with the defender.
Anyone that thinks that's a foul should stop watching football altogether, as they have no idea what they're watching.
It was a blatant dive and it should've been overturned. It wasn't because Tierney is ****ing useless and he gave it to his namesake.
The Premier League should ban him in the same way that they did Niasse for Everton, but they won't.
Cavani should've been banned for this last week, but they're not fit for purpose:
You must log in or register to see media
On first viewing, I thought it was a clear foul. Watching the replays, I wouldn't have given a penalty for it because I do feel Tierney's gone down too easily. However, if we look at the standards of what's a penalty these days, any contact whatsoever in the box from a defender on an attacker can result in an advantage for the attacking team. Until this changes, and common sense is applied, players will keep doing it. The Tierney incident isn't the first one of its kind to be rewarded with a penalty.
The fact that there's benefit of VAR, looking at the incident from multiple angles, with two assistant VAR officials at Stockley Park too, and none of them deemed it worthy to overturn, should be the wider concern.
And he's already got such a great connection with the fans!Ex-Chelsea? In his 30s? Past it? High wages?
Yep, we're definitely interested
He was never sent off in the Premier League, so it's about time he corrected that.