Rival watch
- Thread starter Spurlock
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
See, you just can't admit your golden boys as dirty as the rest can ya
You must log in or register to see images
Seeing Sucky spiral here, and the mention of our Brian,
automatically suggests we bring the following over from
the "Mouser watch" ...
automatically suggests we bring the following over from
the "Mouser watch" ...
You must log in or register to see images
That's ok. I know you lot have to take up the call to arms on social media.
An ex-Chelsea player slagged off Salah for diving when he did, so you've got to talk about Harry Kane a lot.
Reaching there a bit don't ya think?
Just throwing some much deserved shade on golden boy hazza.
I didnt expect anyone to admit he buys pens like, this is the spurs equivalent of a David ike thread tbh, which is what makes it so much fun
Did Kane dive for that pen yday?That's ok. I know you lot have to take up the call to arms on social media.
An ex-Chelsea player slagged off Salah for diving when he did, so you've got to talk about Harry Kane a lot.
Go on give it a try
I don't even think that anyone other than you is claiming that he did. It's a bizarre claim, frankly.Did Kane dive for that pen yday?
Go on give it a try
It's clearly not a dive. You can claim that he fouled Lallana or was looking for it and initiated contact, but a dive? What?
Salah dived and people were talking about it, so Liverpool have to claim that they're being persecuted and find someone to blame.
It's obviously Harry Kane's fault, because Tony Cascarino had a go at Salah...
Makes a change from blaming Pickford, I guess.
No. He put himself between Lallana and the ball, so that he'd be fouled.
Salah was fouled and then dived. Penalty and simulation. He cheated and he also deserved the penalty.
Both are penalties, but they're not the same thing and shouldn't be compared. They're not remotely similar.
Surely the question with regards the Kane incident is what the **** is an experienced player like Lallana doing making that ridiculous challenge on the edge of the box, Kane is waiting for him thats not in question, but Lallana must know that he cannot win the ball fairly so I think he is also trying to be clever and hoping that he gets the foul for Kane making the back. They get given both ways seen loads of matches where these are given either way, on this occasion I think the clumsiness of Lallanas effort has convinced all of the officials that he was the offender hence the decision in our favour.
He did have every right to go for the ball. He didn't get it and got Kane, instead. That's called a foul.
Kane knowing that he was going to be fouled doesn't undo it, somehow. It's a stupid challenge from the ex-Scouser.
My team in Cyprus, this will be interesting I have never seen a team in Cyprus play hoof ball.
[
Lailana is not the sharpest tool in the box, but he may be one of the biggest ...
https://www.not606.com/threads/2017-18-pl2-thread.350654/page-9#post-11425738
Lailana is not the sharpest tool in the box, but he may be one of the biggest ...
https://www.not606.com/threads/2017-18-pl2-thread.350654/page-9#post-11425738
it's not abandoned i'll have you know it's just i'm often away in my second home .They're squatting. It's abandoned property...