Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If I was to liken Kroenke to anyone in football, it would be Alan Sugar.

During his reign, we spent money, buying Klinsmann, Ginola, Ferdinand, etc. We got to some semi-finals, won a Worthington Cup, didn't get relegated and made it into Europe once, without needing a war to achieve it. We weren't ruined, we just made a series of "Meh" decisions and succeeded in drifting into the footballing backwaters.

Arsenal's owners need to decide upon an identy, now that City, Chelsea, Liverpool and United can blow you out of the water financially. Make that decision and commit to it. Currently, it's got no identifiable plan about it and the money's being mis-managed, which is always a bad sign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrunelGooner
If I was to liken Kroenke to anyone in football, it would be Alan Sugar.

During his reign, we spent money, buying Klinsmann, Ginola, Ferdinand, etc. We got to some semi-finals, won a Worthington Cup, didn't get relegated and made it into Europe once, without needing a war to achieve it. We weren't ruined, we just made a series of "Meh" decisions and succeeded in drifting into the footballing backwaters.

Arsenal's owners need to decide upon an identy, now that City, Chelsea, Liverpool and United can blow you out of the water financially. Make that decision and commit to it. Currently, it's got no identifiable plan about it and the money's being mis-managed, which is always a bad sign.
I've always said that Arsenal signing Andrei Arshavin was the exact point where the identity that Wenger had cultivated for a decade at that point was tossed aside, and the fact this happened once Kroenke was established at the club can't be a coincidence

Before they signed him the club's identity was obvious for everyone to see: scout a youngster who would be a starter 2-3 years down the line, carefully nurture them as they go from prospect to first teamer to guaranteed starter/full international, and if they were to depart the club would make a huge profit so they would be able to repeat the process with two or three or four more prospects

Arshavin completely went against this: he wasn't an unpolished gem, he was a player at his peak with his profile raised by his performances for Zenit and the Russian team at the previous summer's Euros, meaning that not only was the fee significantly more than they paid for Fabregas, van Persie, Toure etc but the expectations were significantly higher, and within a couple of years the club's transfer policy started to drastically change with Mertesacker, Podolski, Arteta and whoever Barca or Los Ladrones needed to get rid of to meet FFP being brought in
 
Oh, he knows about business alright...but knows **** all about football in England. Neither do \ny of the senior management team brought in to replace Wenger and Gazidis. Everyone's learning from their mistakes.

The wage spend is out of control arising from desperation, a lack of transfer budget and increasingly short term decisions. Borrowing next season's money to buy Nicolas Pepe was a real punt. Currently, it looks a poor decision all round.

It's going to be very interesting to see what happens to Aubameyang this summer. Can Arsenal sell him, as they did did Henry, Viera, Petit, Overmars, etc? This is the smart move for a club outside City or United...or do you offer him an Ozil style monster deal at 31 years old...and will he be interested?

Do the Kroemke's have plans worked out for no European football next season and what happens to sponsorships and kit deals? Without some dumb luck, it's set up to get worse before it gets better.

The thing with the Ozil contract situation is that he wasn't delivering consistently enough to justify the wage hike in the first place. I even remember saying at the time it happened that it was a massive risk which could backfire if he doesn't raise his game. The fact he's still at the club is telling.

Aubameyang on the other hand has delivered for us more often than not. He is without question one of the best strikers around. IF he was interested in staying, I would be inclined to keep him even if it meant offering him Ozil-esque wages. Let's be honest, if we sold him, we will have to spend crazy amounts to replace him anyway. It will be nigh on impossible to get a reliable goalscorer of that calibre considering our current status as a 'has-been'.

I'd be inclined to push the boat out for Aubameyang. More so if Ozil leaves this Summer with 1 year left on his deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD
The thing with the Ozil contract situation is that he wasn't delivering consistently enough to justify the wage hike in the first place. I even remember saying at the time it happened that it was a massive risk which could backfire if he doesn't raise his game. The fact he's still at the club is telling.

If it's any consolation, we somewhat Ozil'd ourselves with Alderweireld.
 
If it's any consolation, we somewhat Ozil'd ourselves with Alderweireld.

Your squad is still in a better shape than ours and you're not as financially hamstrung like we are. I'd rather be in your position than ours. And this is something I absolutely should not have been saying considering the money we've spent from 2014 onwards.
 
You must log in or register to see media

Good goal by Lewis. Might be one worth keeping an eye on if Norwich go down.
 
Reading today an article about American "Football" stars who earned millions during their careers and are now almost bankrupt,having spent on lavish parties and mansions.
Are our footballers being taken care of by their agents etc I wonder? Or...…..